These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22992823)
1. Progression of periacetabular osteolytic lesions. Howie DW; Neale SD; Martin W; Costi K; Kane T; Stamenkov R; Findlay DM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(16):e1171-6. PubMed ID: 22992823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Progression of acetabular periprosthetic osteolytic lesions measured with computed tomography. Howie DW; Neale SD; Stamenkov R; McGee MA; Taylor DJ; Findlay DM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1818-25. PubMed ID: 17671023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. Leung S; Naudie D; Kitamura N; Walde T; Engh CA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 87(3):592-7. PubMed ID: 15741627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. Puri L; Wixson RL; Stern SH; Kohli J; Hendrix RW; Stulberg SD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):609-14. PubMed ID: 11940623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of progression of pelvic osteolysis after cementless total hip arthroplasty: computed tomographic study. Suh DH; Han SB; Yun HH; Chun SK; Shon WY J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1851-5. PubMed ID: 23988435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric computerized tomography as a measurement of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis and its correlation with wear. Looney RJ; Boyd A; Totterman S; Seo GS; Tamez-Pena J; Campbell D; Novotny L; Olcott C; Martell J; Hayes FA; O'Keefe RJ; Schwarz EM Arthritis Res; 2002; 4(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11879538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distribution of periacetabular osteolytic lesions varies according to component design. Stamenkov RB; Howie DW; Neale SD; McGee MA; Taylor DJ; Findlay DM J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 19775854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A three-dimensional method for evaluating changes in acetabular osteolytic lesions in response to treatment. Egawa H; Ho H; Huynh C; Hopper RH; Engh CA; Engh CA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):480-90. PubMed ID: 19701674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between the pelvic osteolytic volume on computed tomography and clinical outcome in patients with cementless acetabular components. Yun HH; Shon WY; Hong SJ; Yoon JR; Yang JH Int Orthop; 2011 Oct; 35(10):1453-9. PubMed ID: 20927513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of judet oblique x-rays in preoperative assessment of acetabular periprosthetic osteolysis: a preliminary study. Thomas A; Epstein NJ; Stevens K; Goodman SB Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Jul; 36(7):E107-10. PubMed ID: 17694194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Periprosthetic osteolysis after AES total ankle replacement: Conventional radiography versus CT-scan. Viste A; Al Zahrani N; Brito N; Lienhart C; Fessy MH; Besse JL Foot Ankle Surg; 2015 Sep; 21(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 26235854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multislice computed tomography for evaluating acetabular defects in revision THA. Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Tapia M; Martin-Hervas C Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():138-43. PubMed ID: 17960676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs for evaluating pelvic osteolysis. Kitamura N; Pappedemos PC; Duffy PR; Stepniewski AS; Hopper RH; Engh CA; Engh CA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():239-45. PubMed ID: 17290152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does computed tomography add information on radiographic analysis in detecting periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty? Kohonen Ia; Koivu H; Pudas T; Tiusanen H; Vahlberg T; Mattila K Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Feb; 34(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 23413056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cemented liner exchange with bone grafting halts the progression of periacetabular osteolysis. Stamenkov R; Neale SD; Kane T; Findlay DM; Taylor DJ; Howie DW J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):822-6. PubMed ID: 24074890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quality of osteolysis grafting with cementless acetabular component retention. Engh CA; Egawa H; Beykirch SE; Hopper RH; Engh CA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():150-4. PubMed ID: 17876287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitoring and risk of progression of osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. Ries MD; Link TM Instr Course Lect; 2013; 62():207-14. PubMed ID: 23395026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are periprosthetic osteolytic lesions in ankle worth bone grafting? Kohonen I; Koivu H; Tiusanen H; Kankare J; Vahlberg T; Mattila K Foot Ankle Surg; 2017 Jun; 23(2):128-133. PubMed ID: 28578796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup has no osteolysis on CT at 10 years. Moen TC; Ghate R; Salaz N; Ghodasra J; Stulberg SD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):382-6. PubMed ID: 20809172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]