These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22992868)

  • 1. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guidelines.
    Krupinski E
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Feb; 26(1):1. PubMed ID: 22992868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.
    Kanal KM; Krupinski E; Berns EA; Geiser WR; Karellas A; Mainiero MB; Martin MC; Patel SB; Rubin DL; Shepard JD; Siegel EL; Wolfman JA; Mian TA; Mahoney MC
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Feb; 26(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 22992865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for digital radiography.
    Andriole KP; Ruckdeschel TG; Flynn MJ; Hangiandreou NJ; Jones AK; Krupinski E; Seibert JA; Shepard SJ; Walz-Flannigan A; Mian TA; Pollack MS
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Feb; 26(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 22992867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.
    Parikh J; Fanus D
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):854-60. PubMed ID: 17411717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression.
    Avrin D; Morin R; Piraino D; Rowberg A; Detorie N; Zuley M; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 17412135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency of lesion size in digital mammography.
    Clunie DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):W257; author reply W258. PubMed ID: 20729426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--what about physics?
    Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130208. PubMed ID: 23690437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--what about physics? Author reply.
    Hogg P; Taylor M; Szczepura K; Mercer C; Denton E
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130267. PubMed ID: 23690439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Yaffe MJ; Maidment AD; Martin MC; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608. PubMed ID: 17412134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Challenges of Implementing an Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Technology Into Clinical Practice.
    Lee CI; Lehman CD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R61-R66. PubMed ID: 27814817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
    Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should breast imaging practices convert to digital mammography? A response from members of the DMIST Executive Committee.
    Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe M; Conant EF; Gatsonis C
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 17885176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lesion size inaccuracies in digital mammography.
    Paquelet JR; Hendrick RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W115-8. PubMed ID: 20028882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests for breast cancer. Mammography is going digital. But is it better than film?
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 May; 32(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 17575613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laser printers in digital mammography.
    Bogucki TM; Haus AG
    Adm Radiol J; 1997; 16(6-7):14-8. PubMed ID: 10170267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advanced digital mammography.
    Schilling RB; Cox JD; Sharma SR
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):163-5. PubMed ID: 9735459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting film-screen mammographic image quality.
    Mathis JH
    J Clin Eng; 1995; 20(5):376-87. PubMed ID: 10152444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using a NPWE model observer to assess suitable image quality for a digital mammography quality assurance programme.
    Monnin P; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):459-62. PubMed ID: 20395413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Mammography System Registration Application Data Technical Review Concerns].
    Zhang Y; Liu L; Xu W
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 43(4):290-293. PubMed ID: 31460724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Best Practices in Digital Radiography.
    DeMaio DN; Herrmann T; Noble LB; Orth D; Peterson P; Young J; Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2019 Nov; 91(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 31685600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.