BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22992901)

  • 1. Sperm morphology classification: a rational method for schemes adopted by the world health organization.
    Rothmann SA; Bort AM; Quigley J; Pillow R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():27-37. PubMed ID: 22992901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sperm morphology assessment using strict (tygerberg) criteria.
    Menkveld R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():39-50. PubMed ID: 22992902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Which assisted reproduction technique as a function of sperm morphology?].
    Guérif F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Sep; 38(9):508-10. PubMed ID: 20692863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications.
    Morbeck DE; Leonard PH; Weaver AL; Shimek KM; Bouwsma EV; Coddington CC
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Dec; 96(6):1350-4. PubMed ID: 21958691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consistency of sperm morphology classification methods.
    Davis RO; Gravance CG
    J Androl; 1994; 15(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 8188540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A comparative study of sperm morphology evaluation criteria by the fifth and fourth editions of WHO Laboratory Manual].
    Zhang XZ; Yao KS; Xiong CL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Nov; 17(11):989-92. PubMed ID: 22141268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel approach for the selection of human sperm using annexin V-binding and flow cytometry.
    Hoogendijk CF; Kruger TF; Bouic PJ; Henkel RR
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1285-92. PubMed ID: 18371961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sperm morphology assessment using David's classification: time to switch to strict criteria? Prospective comparative analysis in a selected IVF population.
    Blanchard M; Haguenoer K; Apert A; Poret H; Barthélémy C; Royère D; Guérif F
    Int J Androl; 2011 Apr; 34(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 20497261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.
    Menkveld R
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 20111081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abnormal sperm count and motility on semen analysis are not sufficiently predictive of abnormal Kruger morphology.
    Morelli SS; Seungdamrong A; McCulloh DH; McGovern PG
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2882-4. PubMed ID: 20674904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects.
    Eliasson R
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 20111078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphological classification of sperm heads using artificial neural networks.
    Yi WJ; Park KS; Paick JS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():1071-4. PubMed ID: 10384625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural sperm birefringence can be used to estimate sperm viability and morphology.
    Collodel G; Federico MG; Pascarelli NA; Geminiani M; Moretti E
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 20925592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics?
    Auger J
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20111080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new real-time morphology classification for human spermatozoa: a link for fertilization and improved embryo quality.
    Cassuto NG; Bouret D; Plouchart JM; Jellad S; Vanderzwalmen P; Balet R; Larue L; Barak Y
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18990390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance.
    Barratt CL; Björndahl L; Menkveld R; Mortimer D
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3207-12. PubMed ID: 21965314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semen analysis and sperm function testing.
    Franken DR; Oehninger S
    Asian J Androl; 2012 Jan; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 22179512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tests to measure the quality of spermatozoa at spermiation.
    Amann RP
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 20111084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: its applicability to andrology laboratories in China].
    Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Oct; 16(10):867-71. PubMed ID: 21243747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphology training is compulsory to ensure relevant clinical results.
    Franken DR; Avari K; Palshetkar N
    Andrologia; 2008 Dec; 40(6):377-80. PubMed ID: 19032688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.