These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Comparison of three sperm preparation media. Sharma RK; Seifarth K; Garlak D; Agarwal A Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Normal reference ranges for semen quality and their relations to fecundity. Skakkebaek NE Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 20111088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program. Joshi N; Kodwany G; Balaiah D; Parikh M; Parikh F Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8673156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. National semen analysis reference range reporting: adherence to the 1999 World Health Organization guidelines 10 years later. Penn HA; Windsperger A; Smith Z; Parekattil SJ; Kuang WW; Kolettis PN; Nangia AK Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2320-3. PubMed ID: 21457971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Rabbit sexual behavior, semen and sperm characteristics when supplemented with sprouted wheat. Fallas-López M; Rodríguez-De Lara R; Bárcena-Gama R; Sánchez-Torres Esqueda MT; Hernández-Sánchez D; Martínez-Hernández PA; Aguilar-Romero O Anim Reprod Sci; 2011 Dec; 129(3-4):221-8. PubMed ID: 22270001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Classification of hyperactivated spermatozoa using a robust Minimum Bounding Square Ratio algorithm. Kaula N; Andrews A; Durso C; Dixon C; Graham JK Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():4941-4. PubMed ID: 19963873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination. Esteves SC Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 25254609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. New WHO-reference limits-revolution or storm in a teapot? Haidl G Asian J Androl; 2011 Mar; 13(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 21170075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison between WHO (World Health Organization) 2010 and WHO 1999 parameters for semen analysis - interpretation of 529 consecutive samples. Catanzariti F; Cantoro U; Lacetera V; Muzzonigro G; Polito M Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2013 Sep; 85(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 24085233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A fully automated hybrid human sperm detection and classification system based on mobile-net and the performance comparison with conventional methods. Ilhan HO; Sigirci IO; Serbes G; Aydin N Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 May; 58(5):1047-1068. PubMed ID: 32144650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of normal sperm morphology outcomes from two different computer-assisted semen analysis systems. Coetzee K; Bermes N; Krause W; Menkveld R Andrologia; 2001 May; 33(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11380331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Updates in protocol for human semen examination.]. Sapozhkova ZY; Eremin KI Klin Lab Diagn; 2020; 65(2):106-110. PubMed ID: 32159308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Holographic imaging of unlabelled sperm cells for semen analysis: a review. Di Caprio G; Ferrara MA; Miccio L; Merola F; Memmolo P; Ferraro P; Coppola G J Biophotonics; 2015 Oct; 8(10):779-89. PubMed ID: 25491593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Practical semen analysis: from A to Z. Brazil C Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 20111076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A standardized test for visual analysis of human sperm morphology. Davis RO; Gravance CG; Overstreet JW Fertil Steril; 1995 May; 63(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 7720918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Semen analysis: a new manual and its application to the understanding of semen and its pathology. Jequier AM Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 20111075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]