328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22993216)
1. Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT.
Bankier AA; Kressel HY
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 22993216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose reduction in CT.
Hemme E
Radiol Technol; 2010; 82(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 21048071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. CT radiation dose reduction by modifying primary factors.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Thrall JH; Mahesh M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 May; 8(5):369-72. PubMed ID: 21531317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CT in children: why and what to consider for CT in children.
Riccabona M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 82(7):1041-2. PubMed ID: 22197091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CT dose metrics.
Huda W
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):964-5. PubMed ID: 23704294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pediatric computed tomography imaging guideline.
Young C; Owens CM
Acta Radiol; 2013 Nov; 54(9):998-1006. PubMed ID: 23436822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Procedures, spectrum and radiation exposure in CT-fluoroscopy].
Stoeckelhuber BM; Schulz E; Melchert UH; Blobel J; Gellissen J; Gehl H; Weiss HD; Leibecke T
Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 14618963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response.
McCollough CH
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):966-7. PubMed ID: 23844422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Response.
Brady SL; Kaufman RA
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):965-6. PubMed ID: 23844421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Response.
Bankier AA; Kressel HY
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):966. PubMed ID: 23844420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracking radiation exposure of patients.
Rehani M; Frush D
Lancet; 2010 Sep; 376(9743):754-5. PubMed ID: 20816532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. CT dose reduction strategy: to modulate dose or not in certain patients?
Mahesh M; Fishman EK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Dec; 9(12):931-2. PubMed ID: 23206653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of the knowledge of physicians prescribing CT examinations on the radiation protection of patients].
Gervaise A; Esperabe-Vignau F; Pernin M; Naulet P; Portron Y; Lapierre-Combes M
J Radiol; 2011; 92(7-8):681-7. PubMed ID: 21819910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing body CT radiation dose: beyond just changing the numbers.
Hara AK; Wellnitz CV; Paden RG; Pavlicek W; Sahani DV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 23789656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-dose techniques in CT-guided interventions.
Sarti M; Brehmer WP; Gay SB
Radiographics; 2012; 32(4):1109-19; discussion 1119-20. PubMed ID: 22786997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose shift in relative proportion: the case of coronary artery calcium studies.
Mahesh M; Zimmerman SL; Fishman EK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jun; 11(6):634-5. PubMed ID: 24726446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols.
Smith AB; Dillon WP; Gould R; Wintermark M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Oct; 28(9):1628-32. PubMed ID: 17893208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT dose reduction applications: available tools on the latest generation of CT scanners.
Raman SP; Johnson PT; Deshmukh S; Mahesh M; Grant KL; Fishman EK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 23290672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bismuth shields for CT dose reduction: do they help or hurt?
McCollough CH; Wang J; Berland LL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Dec; 8(12):878-9. PubMed ID: 22137008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options.
McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM
Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 16549613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
