These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22994869)

  • 41. Mothers' sense of coherence and oral health related quality of life of preschool children in Udupi Taluk.
    Khatri SG; Acharya S; Srinivasan SR
    Community Dent Health; 2014 Mar; 31(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 24741891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
    Zanoli G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Oral health-related quality of life of patients with oral lichen planus, oral leukoplakia, or oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Karbach J; Al-Nawas B; Moergel M; Daubländer M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Aug; 72(8):1517-22. PubMed ID: 25037185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol.
    Johnston BC; Ebrahim S; Carrasco-Labra A; Furukawa TA; Patrick DL; Crawford MW; Hemmelgarn BR; Schunemann HJ; Guyatt GH; Nesrallah G
    BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e007953. PubMed ID: 26428330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinician/Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Association After Root Canal Treatment.
    Wong J; Cheng Lee AH; Pan Cheung GS; McGrath C; Neelakantan P
    J Endod; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39342990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Enhancing periodontal health through regenerative approaches: a commentary on the need for patient-reported outcomes.
    Inglehart MR
    J Periodontol; 2015 Feb; 86(2 Suppl):S4-7. PubMed ID: 25644299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Including the patient's oral health perspective in evidence-based decision-making.
    Paulson DR; Pattanaik S; Chanthavisouk P; John MT
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2021 Aug; 64(8):959-966. PubMed ID: 34244813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review.
    Ousmen A; Touraine C; Deliu N; Cottone F; Bonnetain F; Efficace F; Brédart A; Mollevi C; Anota A
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):228. PubMed ID: 30537955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Although not consistently superior, the absolute approach to framing the minimally important difference has advantages over the relative approach.
    Zhang Y; Zhang S; Thabane L; Furukawa TA; Johnston BC; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 68(8):888-94. PubMed ID: 25892192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life.
    Norman GR; Sridhar FG; Guyatt GH; Walter SD
    Med Care; 2001 Oct; 39(10):1039-47. PubMed ID: 11567167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quality of life instruments in the evaluation of new drugs.
    Jaeschke R; Guyatt GH; Cook D
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1992 Feb; 1(2):84-94. PubMed ID: 10146938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Approaches and recommendations for estimating minimally important differences for health-related quality of life measures.
    Hays RD; Farivar SS; Liu H
    COPD; 2005 Mar; 2(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 17136964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Triangulation of multiple meaningful change thresholds for patient-reported outcome scores.
    Trigg A; Griffiths P
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2755-2764. PubMed ID: 34319532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Toward a rigorous assessment of the statistical performances of methods to estimate the Minimal Important Difference of Patient-Reported Outcomes: A protocol for a large-scale simulation study.
    Vanier A; Leroy M; Hardouin JB
    Methods; 2022 Aug; 204():396-409. PubMed ID: 35202798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Interpretability, validity, and the minimum important difference.
    McClimans L
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2011 Dec; 32(6):389-401. PubMed ID: 21792659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The relation between the minimally important difference and patient benefit.
    Norman GR
    COPD; 2005 Mar; 2(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17136965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Interpreting Change in Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments.
    Coon CD; Cappelleri JC
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2016 Jan; 50(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 30236016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Seeing the patient's perspective: a guide to patient-reported outcome measures and minimal important differences in ophthalmic research.
    Qasim A; Devji T; Phillips MR; Wykoff CC; Kaiser PK; Thabane L; Bhandari M; Chaudhary V;
    Eye (Lond); 2022 Jul; 36(7):1339-1341. PubMed ID: 35197561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Minimal important difference of change in patient-specific goals in severe emphysema patients.
    Hartman JE; Klooster K; Koster TD; van Dijk M; Slebos DJ
    ERJ Open Res; 2020 Oct; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 33123552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Requirements on construction methods for MID values should be fulfilled for at least one method.
    Vach W; Saxer F
    Qual Life Res; 2024 Oct; 33(10):2647-2648. PubMed ID: 38980639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.