283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22995660)
21. Acetabular strains produced by oversized press fit cups.
Ries MD; Harbaugh M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Jan; (334):276-81. PubMed ID: 9005924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hemiarthroplasty of hip joint: An experimental validation using porcine acetabulum.
Pawaskar SS; Grosland NM; Ingham E; Fisher J; Jin Z
J Biomech; 2011 May; 44(8):1536-42. PubMed ID: 21439570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three-fin acetabular prosthesis for superior acetabular bone defects: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu YZ; Hai Y; Zhao H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(5):901-5. PubMed ID: 22490594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Design factors influencing performance of constrained acetabular liners: finite element characterization.
Bouchard SM; Stewart KJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2006; 39(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 16488227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A stress analysis of acetabular reconstruction in protrusio acetabuli.
Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Pedersen DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1983 Apr; 65(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 6833325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robust design for acetabular cup stability accounting for patient and surgical variability.
Ong KL; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031001. PubMed ID: 18532850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of under-reaming on the cup/bone interface of a press fit hip replacement.
Zivkovic I; Gonzalez M; Amirouche F
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Apr; 132(4):041008. PubMed ID: 20387971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The use of cementless acetabular component in revision surgery without pelvic discontinuity.
Cherubino P; D'Angelo F; Surace MF; Murena L; Vulcano E
Surg Technol Int; 2010 Oct; 20():315-20. PubMed ID: 21082580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of cup outer sizes on the contact mechanics and cement fixation of cemented total hip replacements.
Hua X; Li J; Wang L; Wilcox R; Fisher J; Jin Z
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Oct; 37(10):1008-14. PubMed ID: 26343226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Finite element modelling for assessing effect of acetabular component orientation on the basic stress path above acetabular dome.
Nie Y; Pei FX; Li ZM
Orthop Surg; 2015 Feb; 7(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 25708038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of head diameter and wall thickness on deformations of metallic acetabular press-fit cups and UHMWPE liners: a finite element analysis.
Goebel P; Kluess D; Wieding J; Souffrant R; Heyer H; Sander M; Bader R
J Orthop Sci; 2013 Mar; 18(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 23377753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A novel method to assess primary stability of press-fit acetabular cups.
Crosnier EA; Keogh PS; Miles AW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1126-34. PubMed ID: 25384445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis.
Amirouche F; Solitro GF; Walia A; Gonzalez M; Bobko A
Int Orthop; 2017 Aug; 41(8):1527-1533. PubMed ID: 28012048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of the pelvic bone on the computational results of the acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis.
Barreto S; Folgado J; Fernandes PR; Monteiro J
J Biomech Eng; 2010 May; 132(5):054503. PubMed ID: 20459214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects with porous metal augment in total hip arthroplasty: A finite element analysis study.
Li P; Tang H; Liu X; Chen Z; Zhang X; Zhou Y; Jin Z
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Feb; 236(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 34686098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
