These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22995761)

  • 1. Highlights of the conference 'The hidden side of DNA profiles: Artifacts, errors and uncertain evidence'.
    Pascali V; Prinz M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):775-7. PubMed ID: 22995761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
    Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA evidence and miscarriages of justice.
    Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():e1-e3. PubMed ID: 30579629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic DNA evidence is not infallible.
    Cale CM
    Nature; 2015 Oct; 526(7575):611. PubMed ID: 26511542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling heterozygote balance in forensic DNA profiles.
    Kelly H; Bright JA; Curran JM; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 22921959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GHEP-ISFG collaborative simulated exercise for DVI/MPI: Lessons learned about large-scale profile database comparisons.
    Vullo CM; Romero M; Catelli L; Šakić M; Saragoni VG; Jimenez Pleguezuelos MJ; Romanini C; Anjos Porto MJ; Puente Prieto J; Bofarull Castro A; Hernandez A; Farfán MJ; Prieto V; Alvarez D; Penacino G; Zabalza S; Hernández Bolaños A; Miguel Manterola I; Prieto L; Parsons T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():45-53. PubMed ID: 26716885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of wild card designations and rare alleles in forensic DNA database searches.
    Tvedebrink T; Bright JA; Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():98-104. PubMed ID: 25576850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of DNA tests: a decision perspective.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Bernard M; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17209907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whose DNA is this? How relevant a question? (a note for forensic scientists).
    Taroni F; Biedermann A; Vuille J; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Jul; 7(4):467-70. PubMed ID: 23623242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forensic DNA and bioinformatics.
    Bianchi L; Liò P
    Brief Bioinform; 2007 Mar; 8(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 17384432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publications and letters related to the forensic genetic analysis of low amounts of DNA.
    Schneider PM; Butler JM; Carracedo A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21159566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian networks and dissonant items of evidence: A case study.
    De March I; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102172. PubMed ID: 31629186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interpretation of low level DNA mixtures.
    Kelly H; Bright JA; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 21570375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.