These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22996524)

  • 21. Give every paper a read for reproducibility.
    Winchester C
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):281. PubMed ID: 29769684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The data detective. Interview by Ed Yong.
    Simonsohn U
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7405):18-9. PubMed ID: 22763527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. View point: Retraction is a pain but scientific misconduct is a crime!
    Tewari P
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2018; 21(2):109-110. PubMed ID: 29652267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stem-cell method faces fresh questions.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7492):283. PubMed ID: 24646974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Iranian ministers in plagiarism row.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):578-9. PubMed ID: 19794465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Iranian paper sparks sense of déjà vu.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7216):1019. PubMed ID: 18948918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
    Abbott A; Schwarz J
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Negative results.
    Nature; 2008 May; 453(7193):258. PubMed ID: 18480760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
    Edsall JT
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 'Avalanche' of spider-paper retractions shakes behavioural-ecology community.
    Viglione G
    Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):199-200. PubMed ID: 32047306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities.
    Callaway E
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7371):15. PubMed ID: 22051650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errors.
    Fanelli D
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7595):415. PubMed ID: 27008933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
    Miller DR
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retractions are part of science, but misconduct isn't - lessons from a superconductivity lab.
    Nature; 2024 Apr; 628(8009):689-690. PubMed ID: 38658690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting.
    Fanelli D
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):149. PubMed ID: 23407504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retractions: A clean slate.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7492):389-91. PubMed ID: 24654274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Researcher fails in legal bid to halt expression of concern by journal Diabetes.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2015 Feb; 350():h1112. PubMed ID: 25722185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research ethics: Zero tolerance.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7380):134-6. PubMed ID: 22237090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.