These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2299698)

  • 41. [Digital thorax radiography: flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Sailer J; Kabalan N; Herold C; Prokop M
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 12764583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Digital x-ray systems. Part 2. An overview of digital radiography concepts and an evaluation of cassetteless DX systems.
    Health Devices; 2001 Nov; 30(11):381-401. PubMed ID: 11770228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Technical aspects of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9587768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Current development sin the area of digital thoracic radiography].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Eisenhuber E; Fuchsjäger M; Puig S; Prokop M
    Radiologe; 2001 Mar; 41(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 11322068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Digital chest imaging: selenium radiography versus storage phosphor imaging. Comparison of visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
    Biemans JM; Van Heesewijk JP; Van Der Graaf Y
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11753154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
    Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Recent advances in chest radiography.
    McAdams HP; Samei E; Dobbins J; Tourassi GD; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):663-83. PubMed ID: 17114619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy images on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S; West M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):653-60. PubMed ID: 10624322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Portable chest radiography techniques and teleradiology.
    MacMahon H; Giger M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1996 Jan; 34(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 8539346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Walcher M; Pohl M; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Digital radiography of the thorax].
    Frija J; de Kerviler E; Zagdanski AM; Feger C; Attal P; Laval-Jeantet M
    J Radiol; 1997 Mar; 78(3):193-207. PubMed ID: 9113146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of film-screen, CR and DR: a community hospital time-motion study.
    Mehta M; Lee T
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 14699926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts.
    Busch HP
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7734546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Digital vs conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysis.
    Dalla Palma L; Grisi G; Cuttin R; Rimondini A
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1682-92. PubMed ID: 10525891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Update on digital imaging.
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):1-95. PubMed ID: 2299697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.