177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2299699)
21. Digital chest radiography at the University of Chicago: present status and future plans.
MacMahon H
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7734531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
Schmidt EL; Herbig W
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pediatric digital chest imaging.
Tarver RD; Cohen M; Broderick NJ; Conces DJ
J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2299700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts.
Busch HP
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7734546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors.
Compagnone G; Casadio Baleni M; Di Nicola E; Valentino M; Benati M; Calzolaio LF; Oberhofer N; Fabbri E; Domenichelli S; Barozzi L
Radiol Med; 2013 Jun; 118(4):540-54. PubMed ID: 23090253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality control of storage phosphor digital radiography systems.
Freedman M; Steller D; Jafroudi H; Mun SK
J Digit Imaging; 1995 May; 8(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 7612704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
Farman TT; Farman AG
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Technical aspects of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9587768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. New techniques in chest radiography.
Glazer HS; Muka E; Sagel SS; Jost RG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1994 Jul; 32(4):711-29. PubMed ID: 8022976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Experiences with digital luminescence radiography (DLR) in pediatric radiology].
Vosshenrich R; Weigel W; Fischer U; Funke M; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1739766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Blendl C; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; John V; Wiebringhaus R; Turowski B
Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.
Müller RD; Voss M; Hirche H; Buddenbrock B; John V; Bosch E
Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
