These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22997001)

  • 1. A real-time internal dose assessment exercise.
    Bingham D; Bull RK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 22997001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of voxel phantoms in whole-body counting for the validation of calibration phantoms and the assessment of uncertainties.
    de Carlan L; Roch P; Blanchardon E; Franck D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):477-82. PubMed ID: 17018545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of the uncertainty in internal dose calculation for two contamination cases.
    Blanchardon E; Molokanov A; Franck D; Kochetkov O; Panfilov A; Jourdain JR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):548-52. PubMed ID: 17237182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comments on "Impact of tritium around EDF nuclear power plants".
    Little MP; Lambert BE
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):452-3; author reply 453-4. PubMed ID: 19810285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kalman filtration of radiation monitoring data from atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials.
    Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H; Smith JQ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 15266085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of air monitoring and experimental aerosol data for intake assessment for Mayak plutonium workers.
    Zaytseva YV; Tretyakov FD; Romanov SA; Miller G; Bertelli L; Guilmette RA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):535-9. PubMed ID: 17848389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
    Roy CR
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of internal radiation dose from both immediate releases and continued exposures to contaminated materials.
    Napier B
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N47-50. PubMed ID: 22395282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of tritium around EDF nuclear power plants.
    Le Guen B
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 19454788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of internal exposures to the radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident.
    Balonov MI; Anspaugh LR; Bouville A; Likhtarev IA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):491-6. PubMed ID: 17977893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of a case of internal contamination with cobalt radioisotopes.
    Vrba T; Malatova I; Jurochova B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):527-30. PubMed ID: 17309869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quantification of uncertainties in internal doses assessed from monitoring measurements.
    Etherington G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17237184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis of internal radionuclide contamination by mobile laboratories.
    Castagnet X; Amabile JC; Cazoulat A; Lecompte Y; de Carbonnières H; Laroche P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):469-71. PubMed ID: 17309874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of total effective dose equivalent and collective dose in the event of a LOCA in Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant.
    Raisali G; Davilu H; Haghighishad A; Khodadadi R; Sabet M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16785243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relation between organ and whole body doses and local doses measured by ESR for standard and realistic neutron and photon external overexposures.
    Hervé ML; Clairand I; Trompier F; Tikunov D; Bottollier-Depois JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17337741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity of a low energy Ge detector system for in vivo monitoring in the framework of ICRP 78 applications.
    Lopez MA; Navarro T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 105(1-4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14527012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of total effective dose due to certain environmentally placed naturally occurring radioactive materials using a procedural adaptation of RESRAD code.
    Beauvais ZS; Thompson KH; Kearfott KJ
    Health Phys; 2009 Jul; 97(1):50-67. PubMed ID: 19509509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for human variability and sensitivity in setting standards for electromagnetic fields.
    Bailey WH; Erdreich LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 17495668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.