BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2299708)

  • 1. Enhancement and compression of digital chest radiographs.
    Cohn M; Trefler M; Young TY
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 2299708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current status of digital projectional radiography of the chest.
    Aberle DR; Hansell D; Huang HK
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 2299698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-resolution digital imaging with storage phosphors.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Schaetzing R
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 2299699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and testing of artifact-suppressed adaptive histogram equalization: a contrast-enhancement technique for display of digital chest radiographs.
    Rehm K; Seeley GW; Dallas WJ; Ovitt TW; Seeger JF
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 2299707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lossy compression should not be used in certain imaging applications such as chest radiography. For the proposition.
    Ritenour ER
    Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1773-4. PubMed ID: 10505862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Newer imaging methods in chest radiography.
    Wandtke JC
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 2299696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pediatric digital chest imaging.
    Tarver RD; Cohen M; Broderick NJ; Conces DJ
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2299700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.
    Slone RM; Foos DH; Whiting BR; Muka E; Rubin DA; Pilgram TK; Kohm KS; Young SS; Ho P; Hendrickson DD
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 10796938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing the absorbed dose in analogue radiography of infant chest images by improving the image quality, using image processing techniques.
    Karimian A; Yazdani S; Askari MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):176-9. PubMed ID: 21743073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Principles of image processing in digital chest radiography.
    Prokop M; Neitzel U; Schaefer-Prokop C
    J Thorac Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(3):148-64. PubMed ID: 12867812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital mobile radiography.
    Sagel SS; Jost RG; Glazer HS; Molina PL; Anderson DJ; Solomon SL; Schwarberg J
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 2299701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation dose reduction and improvement of image quality in digital chest radiography by new spatial noise reduction algorithm.
    Lee W; Lee S; Chong S; Lee K; Lee J; Choi JC; Lim C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228609. PubMed ID: 32084154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image-processing technique for suppressing ribs in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network (MTANN).
    Suzuki K; Abe H; MacMahon H; Doi K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Apr; 25(4):406-16. PubMed ID: 16608057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of small peripheral lung cancer by digital chest radiography. Performance of unprocessed versus unsharp mask-processed images.
    Yang ZG; Sone S; Li F; Takashima S; Maruyama Y; Hasegawa M; Hanamura K; Asakura K
    Acta Radiol; 1999 Sep; 40(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 10485239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
    Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of irreversible image compression on diagnostic accuracy in thoracic imaging.
    Aberle DR; Gleeson F; Sayre JW; Brown K; Batra P; Young DA; Stewart BK; Ho BK; Huang HK
    Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 8496031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic quantitative low contrast analysis of digital chest phantom radiographs.
    Kwan AL; Filipow LJ; Le LH
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 12674230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.