These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22998413)

  • 1. Measurements of earplug attenuation under supra-aural and circumaural headphones.
    Tufts JB; Palmer JV; Marshall L
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Oct; 51(10):730-8. PubMed ID: 22998413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an earphone-support device for measuring earplug attenuation.
    Dolan TG; Maurer JF; Dickinson LG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Feb; 54(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 8452096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of clinical techniques for verification of uniform attenuation earplugs.
    Portnuff CDF; Price D
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(sup1):S33-S39. PubMed ID: 30618313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone.
    Van der Aerschot M; Swanepoel de W; Mahomed-Asmail F; Myburgh HC; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):616-22. PubMed ID: 27610920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of earphone and sound field methods for estimating noise attenuation of foam earplugs.
    Carter NL; Upfold G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jun; 54(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 8328360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise attenuation characteristics of the MX-41/AR and the Telephonics circumaural audiometric headsets.
    Bienvenue GR; Michael PL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 721665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content.
    Alali KA; Casali JG
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):99-112. PubMed ID: 21368435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Output levels of commercially available portable compact disc players and the potential risk to hearing.
    Fligor BJ; Cox LC
    Ear Hear; 2004 Dec; 25(6):513-27. PubMed ID: 15604913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional hearing in noise: insert earphones vs. supra-aural headphones.
    Ribera JE
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 Dec; 78(12):1159-61. PubMed ID: 18064922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing thresholds, threshold repeatability, and attenuation values for passive noise-reducing earphone enclosures.
    Frank T; Greer AC; Magistro DM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Nov; 58(11):772-8. PubMed ID: 9373922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of earplugs at a major hazard facility.
    Lee KH; Benke G; Mckenzie D
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 45(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 35023076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of the Audiometric Notch at 4000 and 6000 Hz in Young Adults.
    Bhatt IS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):371-383. PubMed ID: 32746483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.