These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22998413)

  • 21. [Measurement of real personal noise attenuation using earplugs with the E-A-Rfit system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Scarselletta RS; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2013; 104(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 23879065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part I: Review of previous work and the design of an improved test fixture.
    Schroeter J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1065-81. PubMed ID: 3700862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attenuation provided by four different audiometric earphone systems.
    Frank T; Wright DC
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 2307308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation.
    Valentin O; John SM; Laville F
    Noise Health; 2017; 19(86):1-9. PubMed ID: 28164933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
    Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Management of ear-canal collapse.
    Marshall L; Gossman MA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1982 Jun; 108(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 7092670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An objective comparison of leakage between commonly used earplugs.
    Alt JA; Collins WO
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(4):469-72. PubMed ID: 22154019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attenuation as a function of the canal length of custom-molded earplugs: a pilot study.
    Tufts JB; Chen S; Marshall L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):EL446-51. PubMed ID: 23742438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. No correlation between headphone frequency response and retail price.
    Breebaart J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):EL526. PubMed ID: 28618798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance.
    Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Harris DA; Johnson JL; Shaw PB
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 12908866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gender differences in real-world hearing protector attenuation.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Rokas D
    J Otolaryngol; 1988 Apr; 17(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 3385873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
    Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using impedance measurements to detect and quantify the effect of air leaks on the attenuation of earplugs.
    Henriksen V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):510-22. PubMed ID: 18646994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing screening for school children: utility of noise-cancelling headphones.
    Lo AH; McPherson B
    BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord; 2013 May; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 23705872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Attenuation of ultrasonic noise in the 10-16 kHz frequency range by earplugs].
    Kozłowski E; Młyński R
    Med Pr; 2018 Aug; 69(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 29953113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hearing protection for motorcyclists.
    McCombe AW; Binnington J; McCombe TS
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1993 Dec; 18(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 8877221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.