798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22999674)
1. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
Hedayati Z; Shomali M
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Tominaga JY; Ozaki H; Chiang PC; Sumi M; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Bourauel C; Yoshida N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 25085299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of the effect of power arm locations on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontic treatment.
Feng Y; Kong WD; Cen WJ; Zhou XZ; Zhang W; Li QT; Guo HY; Yu JW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):210-219. PubMed ID: 31375231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular anterior intrusion using miniscrews for skeletal anchorage: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
González Del Castillo McGrath M; Araujo-Monsalvo VM; Murayama N; Martínez-Cruz M; Justus-Doczi R; Domínguez-Hernández VM; Ondarza-Rovira R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 30268257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy approaches on dentoalveolar structures during canine retraction: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yang C; Wang C; Deng F; Fan Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26321344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal loading conditions for controlled movement of anterior teeth in sliding mechanics.
Tominaga JY; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Gonzales C; Kobayashi M; Yoshida N
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19852600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimum conditions for parallel translation of maxillary anterior teeth under retraction force determined with the finite element method.
Kim T; Suh J; Kim N; Lee M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 20451783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Skeletally Supported Anterior en Masse Retraction with Varied Lever Arm Lengths and Locations in Lingual Orthodontic Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Study.
Ghannam M; Kamiloğlu B
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9975428. PubMed ID: 34056005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Hybrid Orthodontic Treatment System (HOTS).
Ikegami T; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lee W; Hibino K
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 20552104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified sliding mechanics in extraction cases with a bidimensional approach.
Giancotti A; Greco M
Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 20974453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):542-51. PubMed ID: 15877034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique.
Mo SS; Kim SH; Sung SJ; Chung KR; Chun YS; Kook YA; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e183-91. PubMed ID: 21300229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Numerical simulations of canine retraction with T-loop springs based on the updated moment-to-force ratio.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 21135033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
Çifter M; Saraç M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial effect of multiloop edgewise archwire on the mandibular dentition in Class III malocclusion subjects. A three-dimensional finite element study.
Baek SH; Shin SJ; Ahn SJ; Chang YI
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18276927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
