802 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22999674)
21. A comparative evaluation of different compensating curves in the lingual and labial techniques using 3D FEM.
Sung SJ; Baik HS; Moon YS; Yu HS; Cho YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 12695772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional finite element analysis to evaluate biomechanical effects of different alveolar decortication approaches on rate of canine retraction.
Gupta S; Ahuja S; Bhambri E; Jaura BS; Ahuja V
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):216-226. PubMed ID: 31000446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bone stress and strain modification in diastema closure: 3D analysis using finite element method.
Geramy A; Bouserhal J; Martin D; Baghaeian P
Int Orthod; 2015 Sep; 13(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 26277458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A finite element simulation of initial movement, orthodontic movement, and the centre of resistance of the maxillary teeth connected with an archwire.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 22051537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical features of tooth movement from a lingual appliance in comparison with a labial appliance during space closure in sliding mechanics.
Komaki H; Hamanaka R; Tominaga JY; Jinnai S; Nguyen TA; Kuga D; Koga Y; Yoshida N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Sep; 162(3):307-317. PubMed ID: 35422375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction.
Lombardo L; Scuzzo G; Arreghini A; Gorgun O; Ortan YO; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 24950350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Experimental determination of optimal force system required for control of anterior tooth movement in sliding mechanics.
Sia S; Shibazaki T; Koga Y; Yoshida N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19121498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of a central lower incisor under labial and lingual loads.
Lombardo L; Stefanoni F; Mollica F; Laura A; Scuzzo G; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 23021119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Redefining orthodontic space closure: sequential repetitive loading of the periodontal ligament--a clinical study.
Kalha AS; Kachiwala VA; Govardhan SN; McLaughlin RP; Khurshaid SZ
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20877730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mechanical responses to orthodontic loading: a 3-dimensional finite element multi-tooth model.
Field C; Ichim I; Swain MV; Chan E; Darendeliler MA; Li W; Li Q
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 19201323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Restoration of an alveolar bone defect caused by an ankylosed mandibular molar by root movement of the adjacent tooth with miniscrew implants.
Lee KJ; Joo E; Yu HS; Park YC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):440-9. PubMed ID: 19732679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A finite element analysis of the effects of archwire size on orthodontic tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
Kawamura J; Tamaya N
Prog Orthod; 2019 Jan; 20(1):3. PubMed ID: 30663006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lever arm on bracket vs. lever arm on archwire: A 3D finite element method study of mechanics of miniscrew-supported lingual en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth.
Wu ZM; Li BX; Wang DC; Liu YF; Dong XT; Jiang XF
Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100791. PubMed ID: 37454531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mechanical environment change in root, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone in response to two canine retraction treatment strategies.
Jiang F; Xia Z; Li S; Eckert G; Chen J
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Apr; 18 Suppl 1(0 1):29-38. PubMed ID: 25865531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Locating the center of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth retracted by Double J Retractor with palatal miniscrews.
Jang HJ; Roh WJ; Joo BH; Park KH; Kim SJ; Park YG
Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1023-8. PubMed ID: 20677950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A finite element analysis of the maxillary first molar PDL with maxillary protraction in a mixed dentition Class III malocclusion.
Tanaka OM; Araújo EA; Oliver DR; Behrents RG
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Nov; 18(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 26333535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
