These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22999700)

  • 1. A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a ring device versus conventional circumcision.
    Yue C; Ze-Jun Y; Wu KR; Su XJ; Hu JS; Ma JW; Guo CM; Fang HW; Su R; Zhang Y; Zhang QH
    J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1849-54. PubMed ID: 22999700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].
    Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: comparison of clinical effectiveness].
    Li HN; Xu J; Qu LM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Apr; 16(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 20626160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii].
    Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional circumcision for redundant prepuce or phimosis: a meta analysis].
    Xiao EL; Ding H; Li YQ; Wang ZP
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 24218951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Novel no-flip Shang Ring circumcision for adult males: a clinical application study of 528 cases].
    Yang BH; Jia C; Liu T; Peng YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Aug; 20(8):709-14. PubMed ID: 25195367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: outcomes of 328 cases in China].
    Cheng Y; Peng YF; Liu YD; Tian L; Lü NQ; Su XJ; Yan ZJ; Hu JS; Lee R; Kim HH; Sokal DC; Li PS
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Jul; 15(7):584-92. PubMed ID: 19694369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adult template circumcision: a prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, comparative study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel circumcision device.
    Decastro B; Gurski J; Peterson A
    Urology; 2010 Oct; 76(4):810-4. PubMed ID: 20434760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A report of 918 cases of circumcision with the Shang Ring: comparison between children and adults.
    Wu X; Wang Y; Zheng J; Shen W; Yan JA; Ji H; Li X; Zhang H; Zhou Z
    Urology; 2013 May; 81(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23465168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Outward versus inward placement in Shang Ring circumcision for phimosis and redundant prepuce in adult men: analysis of 527 cases].
    Xie ST; Chen GY; Wei QH; Liu XT; Jiao L; Tang Y
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 24873158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision.
    Cao D; Liu L; Hu Y; Wang J; Yuan J; Dong Q; Wei Q
    Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):799-804. PubMed ID: 25711156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Jin XD; Lu JJ; Liu WH; Zhou J; Yu RK; Yu B; Zhang XJ; Shen BH
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2015 Jun; 48(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 25831203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Progress in the clinical studies of male circumcision using the Shang Ring].
    Lü NQ; Li PS; Sokal D; Cheng Y; Peng YF; Barone M; Huang YR; Goldstein M
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Mar; 17(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 21485538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disposable circumcision suture device: clinical effect and patient satisfaction.
    Lv BD; Zhang SG; Zhu XW; Zhang J; Chen G; Chen MF; Shen HL; Pei ZJ; Chen ZD
    Asian J Androl; 2014; 16(3):453-6. PubMed ID: 24759586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Standardized male circumcision with Shang Ring reduces postoperative complications: a report of 351 cases].
    Peng YF; Yang BH; Jia C; Jiang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Nov; 16(11):963-6. PubMed ID: 21218635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized controlled trial of the shang ring versus conventional surgical techniques for adult male circumcision: safety and acceptability.
    Sokal DC; Li PS; Zulu R; Awori QD; Combes SL; Simba RO; Lee R; Hart C; Perchal P; Hawry HJ; Bowa K; Goldstein M; Barone MA
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2014 Apr; 65(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 24583615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring in children: outcomes of 824 cases].
    Yan B; You H; Zhang K; Tang HY; Mao W; He GH; Yin ZG
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Mar; 16(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 20369555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A new device for removing Shang ring after circumcision ( a report of 257 cases)].
    Zhang JQ; Liu JH; Jin LC; Tian L; Zhang JH; Wang Y; Zhang XD
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 96(14):1128-30. PubMed ID: 27095783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study.
    Zhang Z; Yang B; Yu W; Han Y; Xu Z; Chen H; Chen Y; Dai Y
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 48(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 26797875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chinese Shang Ring Male Circumcision: A Review.
    Ma Q; Fang L; Yin WQ; Ma JW; Wu KR; Yan ZJ; Cheng Y
    Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):127-133. PubMed ID: 28278508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.