259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22999700)
1. A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a ring device versus conventional circumcision.
Yue C; Ze-Jun Y; Wu KR; Su XJ; Hu JS; Ma JW; Guo CM; Fang HW; Su R; Zhang Y; Zhang QH
J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1849-54. PubMed ID: 22999700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].
Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: comparison of clinical effectiveness].
Li HN; Xu J; Qu LM
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Apr; 16(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 20626160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii].
Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional circumcision for redundant prepuce or phimosis: a meta analysis].
Xiao EL; Ding H; Li YQ; Wang ZP
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 24218951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Novel no-flip Shang Ring circumcision for adult males: a clinical application study of 528 cases].
Yang BH; Jia C; Liu T; Peng YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Aug; 20(8):709-14. PubMed ID: 25195367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: outcomes of 328 cases in China].
Cheng Y; Peng YF; Liu YD; Tian L; Lü NQ; Su XJ; Yan ZJ; Hu JS; Lee R; Kim HH; Sokal DC; Li PS
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Jul; 15(7):584-92. PubMed ID: 19694369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adult template circumcision: a prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, comparative study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel circumcision device.
Decastro B; Gurski J; Peterson A
Urology; 2010 Oct; 76(4):810-4. PubMed ID: 20434760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A report of 918 cases of circumcision with the Shang Ring: comparison between children and adults.
Wu X; Wang Y; Zheng J; Shen W; Yan JA; Ji H; Li X; Zhang H; Zhou Z
Urology; 2013 May; 81(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23465168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Outward versus inward placement in Shang Ring circumcision for phimosis and redundant prepuce in adult men: analysis of 527 cases].
Xie ST; Chen GY; Wei QH; Liu XT; Jiao L; Tang Y
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 24873158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision.
Cao D; Liu L; Hu Y; Wang J; Yuan J; Dong Q; Wei Q
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):799-804. PubMed ID: 25711156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
Jin XD; Lu JJ; Liu WH; Zhou J; Yu RK; Yu B; Zhang XJ; Shen BH
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2015 Jun; 48(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 25831203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Progress in the clinical studies of male circumcision using the Shang Ring].
Lü NQ; Li PS; Sokal D; Cheng Y; Peng YF; Barone M; Huang YR; Goldstein M
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Mar; 17(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 21485538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Disposable circumcision suture device: clinical effect and patient satisfaction.
Lv BD; Zhang SG; Zhu XW; Zhang J; Chen G; Chen MF; Shen HL; Pei ZJ; Chen ZD
Asian J Androl; 2014; 16(3):453-6. PubMed ID: 24759586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Standardized male circumcision with Shang Ring reduces postoperative complications: a report of 351 cases].
Peng YF; Yang BH; Jia C; Jiang J
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Nov; 16(11):963-6. PubMed ID: 21218635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized controlled trial of the shang ring versus conventional surgical techniques for adult male circumcision: safety and acceptability.
Sokal DC; Li PS; Zulu R; Awori QD; Combes SL; Simba RO; Lee R; Hart C; Perchal P; Hawry HJ; Bowa K; Goldstein M; Barone MA
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2014 Apr; 65(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 24583615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring in children: outcomes of 824 cases].
Yan B; You H; Zhang K; Tang HY; Mao W; He GH; Yin ZG
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Mar; 16(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 20369555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A new device for removing Shang ring after circumcision ( a report of 257 cases)].
Zhang JQ; Liu JH; Jin LC; Tian L; Zhang JH; Wang Y; Zhang XD
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 96(14):1128-30. PubMed ID: 27095783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study.
Zhang Z; Yang B; Yu W; Han Y; Xu Z; Chen H; Chen Y; Dai Y
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 48(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 26797875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chinese Shang Ring Male Circumcision: A Review.
Ma Q; Fang L; Yin WQ; Ma JW; Wu KR; Yan ZJ; Cheng Y
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):127-133. PubMed ID: 28278508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
