294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22999722)
1. Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Morton G; Chiribiri A; Ishida M; Hussain ST; Schuster A; Indermuehle A; Perera D; Knuuti J; Baker S; Hedström E; Schleyer P; O'Doherty M; Barrington S; Nagel E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 60(16):1546-55. PubMed ID: 22999722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fully automated pixel-wise quantitative CMR-myocardial perfusion with CMR-coronary angiography to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Zhao SH; Guo WF; Yao ZF; Yang S; Yun H; Chen YY; Han TT; Zhou XY; Fu CX; Zeng MS; Li CG; Pan CZ; Jin H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7238-7249. PubMed ID: 37145148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fully quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion ready for clinical use: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.
Engblom H; Xue H; Akil S; Carlsson M; Hindorf C; Oddstig J; Hedeer F; Hansen MS; Aletras AH; Kellman P; Arheden H
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Oct; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29047385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the arterial input sampling location on the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress myocardial perfusion quantification.
Milidonis X; Franks R; Schneider T; Sánchez-González J; Sammut EC; Plein S; Chiribiri A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Mar; 23(1):35. PubMed ID: 33775247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Hsu LY; Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Ta AD; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Chen MY; Shanbhag SM; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 29454767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in systole and diastole.
Motwani M; Kidambi A; Sourbron S; Fairbairn TA; Uddin A; Kozerke S; Greenwood JP; Plein S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Feb; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 24565078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.
Akil S; Hedeer F; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Oddstig J; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Erlinge D; Engblom H
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study.
Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical usefulness of quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve using CZT-SPECT for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with normal stress perfusion imaging.
Shiraishi S; Tsuda N; Sakamoto F; Ogasawara K; Tomiguchi S; Tsujita K; Yamashita Y
J Cardiol; 2020 Apr; 75(4):400-409. PubMed ID: 31753710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Costa MA; Shoemaker S; Futamatsu H; Klassen C; Angiolillo DJ; Nguyen M; Siuciak A; Gilmore P; Zenni MM; Guzman L; Bass TA; Wilke N
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 17678734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-resolution free-breathing automated quantitative myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease.
Crawley R; Kunze KP; Milidonis X; Highton J; McElroy S; Frey SM; Hoefler D; Karamanli C; Wong NCK; Backhaus SJ; Alskaf E; Neji R; Scannell CM; Plein S; Chiribiri A
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jun; 25(7):914-925. PubMed ID: 38525948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve by CZT-SPECT: A head to head comparison with
Acampa W; Zampella E; Assante R; Genova A; De Simini G; Mannarino T; D'Antonio A; Gaudieri V; Nappi C; Buongiorno P; Mainolfi CG; Petretta M; Cuocolo A
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2827-2839. PubMed ID: 32383083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduced global myocardial perfusion reserve in DCM and HCM patients assessed by CMR-based velocity-encoded coronary sinus flow measurements and first-pass perfusion imaging.
Bietenbeck M; Florian A; Shomanova Z; Meier C; Yilmaz A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 107(11):1062-1070. PubMed ID: 29774406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.
Mordini FE; Haddad T; Hsu LY; Kellman P; Lowrey TB; Aletras AH; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24433707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenosine stress CMR perfusion imaging of the temporal evolution of perfusion defects in a porcine model of progressive obstructive coronary artery occlusion.
Van Houten M; Yang Y; Hauser A; Glover DK; Gan LM; Yeager M; Salerno M
NMR Biomed; 2019 Nov; 32(11):e4136. PubMed ID: 31373732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion reserve quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla in comparison to quantitative coronary angiography.
Ikuye K; Buckert D; Schaaf L; Walcher T; Rottbauer W; Bernhardt P
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Mar; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 23537061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects.
Brown LAE; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Johnson K; Fent GJ; Foley JRJ; Garg P; Chew PG; Knott K; Dall'Armellina E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Kellman P; Plein S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
Jaarsma C; Leiner T; Bekkers SC; Crijns HJ; Wildberger JE; Nagel E; Nelemans PJ; Schalla S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(19):1719-28. PubMed ID: 22554604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
