BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22999722)

  • 21. Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.
    Jogiya R; Kozerke S; Morton G; De Silva K; Redwood S; Perera D; Nagel E; Plein S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 60(8):756-65. PubMed ID: 22818072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sex- and age-specific normal values for automated quantitative pixel-wise myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Brown LAE; Gulsin GS; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Yeo JL; Wood AL; Saunderson CED; Das A; Jex N; Chowdhary A; Thirunavukarasu S; Sharrack N; Knott KD; Levelt E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Adlam D; McCann GP; Kellman P; Plein S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Mar; 24(4):426-434. PubMed ID: 36458882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
    Karamitsos TD; Leccisotti L; Arnold JR; Recio-Mayoral A; Bhamra-Ariza P; Howells RK; Searle N; Robson MD; Rimoldi OE; Camici PG; Neubauer S; Selvanayagam JB
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19920032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease.
    Sakuma H; Ishida M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 21(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 34108304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combined Assessment of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Flow Measurement in the Coronary Sinus Improves Prediction of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve in Multivessel Disease.
    Nakamori S; Sakuma H; Dohi K; Ishida M; Tanigawa T; Yamada A; Takase S; Nakajima H; Sawai T; Masuda J; Nagata M; Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Fujii E; Yamada N; Ito M
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jan; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 29432130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters to detect anatomically and hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Futamatsu H; Wilke N; Klassen C; Shoemaker S; Angiolillo DJ; Siuciak A; Morikawa-Futamatsu K; Suzuki N; von Ziegler F; Bass TA; Costa MA
    Am Heart J; 2007 Aug; 154(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 17643580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography.
    Lee JM; Kim CH; Koo BK; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Jeon KH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Na SH; Ahn JM; Park SJ; Kim HS
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27609817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
    Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
    Bratis K; Mahmoud I; Chiribiri A; Nagel E
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 20(5):860-70; quiz 857-9, 871-3. PubMed ID: 23868071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging.
    Danad I; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Heymans MW; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; James S; Sörensen J; Knaapen P; Knuuti J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 64(14):1464-75. PubMed ID: 25277618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.
    Bettencourt N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Azevedo L; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23375929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease between cardiac magnetic resonance and nuclear medical imaging: A meta-analysis.
    Yang K; Yu SQ; Lu MJ; Zhao SH
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 293():278-285. PubMed ID: 31303392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by
    Zampella E; Acampa W; Assante R; Gaudieri V; Nappi C; Mannarino T; Mainolfi CG; Arumugam P; Petretta M; Cuocolo A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1698-1704. PubMed ID: 31836909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue and coronary vascular function in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Nappi C; Ponsiglione A; Acampa W; Gaudieri V; Zampella E; Assante R; Cuocolo R; Mannarino T; Dell'Aversana S; Petretta M; Imbriaco M; Cuocolo A
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 31302673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Ebersberger U; Makowski MR; Schoepf UJ; Platz U; Schmidtler F; Rose J; Kessel A; Roth P; Antoni D; Schnackenburg B; Helmberger T; Rieber J; Hoffmann E; Leber AW
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
    Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
    Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feasibility of dynamic stress
    Han S; Kim YH; Ahn JM; Kang SJ; Oh JS; Shin E; Sung C; Chae SY; Park SJ; Grimberg G; Kovalski G; Moon DH
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2173-2180. PubMed ID: 29858614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Pan J; Huang S; Lu Z; Li J; Wan Q; Zhang J; Gao C; Yang X; Wei M
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25796365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire.
    Kurita T; Sakuma H; Onishi K; Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Yamanaka T; Tanigawa T; Kitamura T; Takeda K; Ito M
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Feb; 30(4):444-52. PubMed ID: 19098020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.