These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2299983)

  • 1. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis.
    Jin L; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 2299983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rate-independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony.
    Lake JA
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):167-91. PubMed ID: 3447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences: II. Four taxa without a molecular clock.
    Zharkikh A; Li WH
    J Mol Evol; 1992 Oct; 35(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 1404421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Property and efficiency of the maximum likelihood method for molecular phylogeny.
    Saitou N
    J Mol Evol; 1988; 27(3):261-73. PubMed ID: 3138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consistency of several phylogeny-inference methods under varying evolutionary rates.
    DeBry RW
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 May; 9(3):537-51. PubMed ID: 1584019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny.
    Hasegawa M; Fujiwara M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8081543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of higher-primate phylogeny from transversion differences in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA by Lake's methods of evolutionary parsimony and operator metrics.
    Holmquist R; Miyamoto MM; Goodman M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):217-36. PubMed ID: 3386527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for inferring phylogenies from nucleic acid sequence data by using maximum likelihood and linear invariants.
    Navidi WC; Churchill GA; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 Jan; 8(1):128-43. PubMed ID: 2002762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum parsimony, substitution model, and probability phylogenetic trees.
    Weng JF; Thomas DA; Mareels I
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 20624099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.