These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23000110)

  • 21. Applications of dielectrophoresis in biotechnology.
    Pethig R; Markx GH
    Trends Biotechnol; 1997 Oct; 15(10):426-32. PubMed ID: 9351287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determination of electric parameters of cell membranes by a dielectrophoresis method.
    Marszalek P; Zielinsky JJ; Fikus M; Tsong TY
    Biophys J; 1991 May; 59(5):982-7. PubMed ID: 1831052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sinusoidal signal analysis of electroporation in biological cells.
    Ramos A; Schneider AL; Suzuki DO; Marques JL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2965-73. PubMed ID: 22996724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhancement of electric field-mediated gene delivery through pretreatment of tumors with a hyperosmotic mannitol solution.
    Henshaw J; Mossop B; Yuan F
    Cancer Gene Ther; 2011 Jan; 18(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 20847751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electroporation theory. Concepts and mechanisms.
    Weaver JC
    Methods Mol Biol; 1995; 47():1-26. PubMed ID: 7550723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of the efficiency of cell membrane electroporation using pulsed ac fields.
    Chen C; Evans JA; Robinson MP; Smye SW; O'Toole P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4747-57. PubMed ID: 18701769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using dielectrophoretic spectra to identify and separate viable yeast cells.
    Bunthawin S; Srichan P; Jaruwongrungsee K; Ritchie RJ
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2023 Dec; 107(24):7647-7655. PubMed ID: 37815615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulation of electroporated cell by chronopotentiometry.
    Kalinowski S; Koronkiewicz S; Kotulska M; Kubica K
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2007 Jan; 70(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16720110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Motion, deformation and aggregation of two cells in a microchannel by dielectrophoresis.
    Ye T; Li H; Lam KY
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Nov; 32(22):3147-56. PubMed ID: 22025180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dielectrophoretic Manipulation of Cancer Cells and Their Electrical Characterization.
    Turcan I; Olariu MA
    ACS Comb Sci; 2020 Nov; 22(11):554-578. PubMed ID: 32786320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fluorometric assay to compensate for non-viable cells during electroporation.
    Peterson AD; Jaroszeski MJ; Gupta VK
    J Fluoresc; 2015 Jan; 25(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 25501856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigating membrane breakdown of neuronal cells exposed to nonuniform electric fields by finite-element modeling and experiments.
    Heida T; Wagenaar JB; Rutten WL; Marani E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Oct; 49(10):1195-203. PubMed ID: 12374345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A time-dependent numerical model of transmembrane voltage inducement and electroporation of irregularly shaped cells.
    Pucihar G; Miklavcic D; Kotnik T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1491-501. PubMed ID: 19203876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of direct current dielectrophoresis on the trajectory of a non-conducting colloidal sphere in a bent pore.
    House DL; Luo H
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Nov; 32(22):3277-85. PubMed ID: 22028275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electroporation based on hydrodynamic focusing of microfluidics with low dc voltage.
    Zhu T; Luo C; Huang J; Xiong C; Ouyang Q; Fang J
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Feb; 12(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19757070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency-Modulated Wave Dielectrophoresis of Vesicles And Cells: Periodic U-Turns at the Crossover Frequency.
    Frusawa H
    Nanoscale Res Lett; 2018 Jun; 13(1):169. PubMed ID: 29881976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo electrical conductivity measurements during and after tumor electroporation: conductivity changes reflect the treatment outcome.
    Ivorra A; Al-Sakere B; Rubinsky B; Mir LM
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5949-63. PubMed ID: 19759406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conductive nanoparticles improve cell electropermeabilization.
    Ghorbel A; Mir LM; García-Sánchez T
    Nanotechnology; 2019 Dec; 30(49):495101. PubMed ID: 31422958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High frequency dielectrophoretic response of microalgae over time.
    Hadady H; Wong JJ; Hiibel SR; Redelman D; Geiger EJ
    Electrophoresis; 2014 Dec; 35(24):3533-40. PubMed ID: 25229637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intracellular potassium under osmotic stress determines the dielectrophoresis cross-over frequency of murine myeloma cells in the MHz range.
    Chung C; Pethig R; Smith S; Waterfall M
    Electrophoresis; 2018 Apr; 39(7):989-997. PubMed ID: 29274244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.