These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23000118)

  • 1. Development of a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):114-24. PubMed ID: 23000118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
    Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Dooley GJ; James CJ; Parisi ES
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 10708069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.
    McDermott H; Varsavsky A
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):065007. PubMed ID: 19850972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.
    Spirrov D; Van Eeckhoutte M; Van Deun L; Francart T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195412. PubMed ID: 29617421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):685-700. PubMed ID: 24165299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.
    Berenstein CK; Vanpoucke FJ; Mulder JJ; Mens LH
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 20946945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
    Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Spirrov D; Wouters J; Francart T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518805363. PubMed ID: 30334496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between adaptive and adjustment procedures for binaural loudness balancing.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Spirrov D; Francart T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3720. PubMed ID: 29960470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott H
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e45385. PubMed ID: 23115622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of bimodal listeners to interaural time differences with modulated single- and multiple-channel stimuli.
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 20571259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 19194294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.
    Spirrov D; van Dijk B; Francart T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):184-193. PubMed ID: 29172895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural directivity patterns for normal and aided human hearing.
    Sivonen VP
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):674-7. PubMed ID: 21552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.