BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23000118)

  • 1. Development of a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):114-24. PubMed ID: 23000118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
    Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Dooley GJ; James CJ; Parisi ES
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 10708069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.
    McDermott H; Varsavsky A
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):065007. PubMed ID: 19850972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.
    Spirrov D; Van Eeckhoutte M; Van Deun L; Francart T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195412. PubMed ID: 29617421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
    Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):685-700. PubMed ID: 24165299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.
    Berenstein CK; Vanpoucke FJ; Mulder JJ; Mens LH
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 20946945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Spirrov D; Wouters J; Francart T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518805363. PubMed ID: 30334496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between adaptive and adjustment procedures for binaural loudness balancing.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Spirrov D; Francart T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3720. PubMed ID: 29960470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott H
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e45385. PubMed ID: 23115622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of bimodal listeners to interaural time differences with modulated single- and multiple-channel stimuli.
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 20571259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 19194294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.
    Spirrov D; van Dijk B; Francart T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):184-193. PubMed ID: 29172895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural directivity patterns for normal and aided human hearing.
    Sivonen VP
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):674-7. PubMed ID: 21552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.