234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23001084)
1. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 23001084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.
Liu QX; Min JX; Deng XF; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(45):17218-26. PubMed ID: 25493038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
Zhou D; Liu QX; Deng XF; Min JX; Dai JG
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 May; 10():67. PubMed ID: 25952323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comments on Hand-sewn Versus Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Wang Q; He XR; Shi CH; Yang KH
Ann Surg; 2015 Jun; 261(6):e156-7. PubMed ID: 24263321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reply to Letter: "Hand-sewn Versus Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis".
Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
Ann Surg; 2015 Jun; 261(6):e157. PubMed ID: 24263333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is There No Significant Difference in the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage Between the Hand-sewn and Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis?
Liu QX; Dai JG
Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):e81. PubMed ID: 24577327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reply to Letter: "Is There No Significant Difference in the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage Between the Hand-sewn and Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis?".
Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):e81-2. PubMed ID: 24670842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Bundred JR; Singh P; Pasquali S; Griffiths EA
BJS Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 32445431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interventions to prevent anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Grigor EJM; Kaaki S; Fergusson DA; Maziak DE; Seely AJE
BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):42. PubMed ID: 33461529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand-sewn versus stapler esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal ressection: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Castro PM; Ribeiro FP; Rocha Ade F; Mazzurana M; Alvarez GA
Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2014; 27(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 25184776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
