These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2300156)

  • 1. UK science budget: environment benefits in UK.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6255):199. PubMed ID: 2300156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US model pushed for UK managers.
    Williams N
    Curr Biol; 2003 Apr; 13(9):R340-1. PubMed ID: 12725742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. UK charities pick up the tab left by government shortfall.
    Hadlington S
    Nature; 1987 Jul 9-15; 328(6126):99. PubMed ID: 3600797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Budget-cutting mood in Congress begins to hit science.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1978 Jul; 201(4353):330-2. PubMed ID: 663659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5597):1313. PubMed ID: 12434024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. House panel kind to NSF budget but trims some programs.
    Boffey PM
    Science; 1969 May; 164(3880):656. PubMed ID: 5778019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MRC planning outweighs excellence in science.
    Staynov D
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6943):918. PubMed ID: 12827171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lean budget leaves scientists wanting more.
    Brumfiel G; Reichhardt T
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):424. PubMed ID: 15565115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science and secrecy.
    Ormerod W
    Nature; 1991 Apr; 350(6319):551-2. PubMed ID: 2017252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. UK medical research: funds scarce.
    Chown M
    Nature; 1984 Aug 30-Sep 5; 310(5980):720. PubMed ID: 6472454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US budget does well by big science in 1989 proposal to Congress.
    Nature; 1988 Feb; 331(6158):646-7. PubMed ID: 3344034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UK science plans spending spree.
    Loder N
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6794):335. PubMed ID: 10935606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Taking issue with UK funding priorities.
    Kealey T
    Nat Med; 1998 Jan; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 9427579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science without a tinge of green.
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6831):851. PubMed ID: 11309568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):714-5. PubMed ID: 18258869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
    Lawler A; Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The distress of the Medical Research Council.
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8419):25-7. PubMed ID: 2856952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRC comes clean.
    Nature; 1970 Jul; 227(5256):324. PubMed ID: 5428422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An old man looks back. Science and the federal government: 1945-1950.
    Conant JB
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1971 Nov; 47(11):1248-51. PubMed ID: 4948845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. OST rows with tide in report on intellectual property.
    Mundell I
    Nature; 1992 Sep; 359(6393):264. PubMed ID: 1406924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.