225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23001715)
1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening method for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
Littlejohn C; Hilton S; Macfarlane GJ; Phull P
Br J Surg; 2012 Nov; 99(11):1488-500. PubMed ID: 23001715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer with flexible-sigmoidoscopy screening: a meta-analysis.
Shroff J; Thosani N; Batra S; Singh H; Guha S
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(48):18466-76. PubMed ID: 25561818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Elmunzer BJ; Hayward RA; Schoenfeld PS; Saini SD; Deshpande A; Waljee AK
PLoS Med; 2012; 9(12):e1001352. PubMed ID: 23226108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized controlled trial: Flexible sigmoidoscopy as an adjunct to faecal occult blood testing in population screening.
Steele RJ; Carey FA; Stanners G; Lang J; Brand J; Brownlee LA; Crichton EM; Winter JW; Phull PS; Mowat C; Strachan JA; Digan AM; Fraser CG
J Med Screen; 2020 Jun; 27(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 31690179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preventing colorectal cancer or early diagnosis: Which is best? A re-analysis of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Report.
Swartz AW; Eberth JM; Strayer SM
Prev Med; 2019 Jan; 118():104-112. PubMed ID: 30367971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Lin JS; Piper MA; Perdue LA; Rutter CM; Webber EM; O'Connor E; Smith N; Whitlock EP
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2576-94. PubMed ID: 27305422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Ali MU; Warren R; Kenny M; Sherifali D; Raina P
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Dec; 15(4):298-313. PubMed ID: 27133893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention.
Emilsson L; Holme Ø; Bretthauer M; Cook NR; Buring JE; Løberg M; Adami HO; Sesso HD; Gaziano MJ; Kalager M
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Jan; 45(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 27859394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time to benefit for colorectal cancer screening: survival meta-analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy trials.
Tang V; Boscardin WJ; Stijacic-Cenzer I; Lee SJ
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1662. PubMed ID: 25881903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current status of screening for colorectal cancer.
Garborg K; Holme Ø; Løberg M; Kalager M; Adami HO; Bretthauer M
Ann Oncol; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1963-72. PubMed ID: 23619033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic yield in a biennial Hemoccult-II screening program compared to a once-only screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy and Hemoccult-II.
Rasmussen M; Fenger C; Kronborg O
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jan; 38(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 12608473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening and primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a review of sex-specific and site-specific differences.
Massat NJ; Moss SM; Halloran SP; Duffy SW
J Med Screen; 2013; 20(3):125-48. PubMed ID: 24197771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme.
Regge D; Iussich G; Segnan N; Correale L; Hassan C; Arrigoni A; Asnaghi R; Bestagini P; Bulighin G; Cassinis MC; Ederle A; Ferraris A; Galatola G; Gallo T; Gandini G; Garretti L; Martina MC; Molinar D; Montemezzi S; Morra L; Motton M; Occhipinti P; Pinali L; Soardi GA; Senore C
Gut; 2017 Aug; 66(8):1434-1440. PubMed ID: 27196588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Zhang J; Cheng Z; Ma Y; He C; Lu Y; Zhao Y; Chang X; Zhang Y; Bai Y; Cheng N
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Dec; 16(4):252-263. PubMed ID: 28687458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Number of Adenomas Removed and Colorectal Cancers Prevented in Randomized Trials of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening.
Pinsky PF; Loberg M; Senore C; Wooldrage K; Atkin W; Bretthauer M; Cross AJ; Hoff G; Holme O; Kalager M; Segnan N; Schoen RE
Gastroenterology; 2018 Oct; 155(4):1059-1068.e2. PubMed ID: 29935150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review of the effectiveness of population screening for colorectal cancer.
Kerr J; Day P; Broadstock M; Weir R; Bidwell S
N Z Med J; 2007 Jul; 120(1258):U2629. PubMed ID: 17653247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial).
Denis B; Gendre I; Aman F; Ribstein F; Maurin P; Perrin P
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3282-90. PubMed ID: 19665368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.
Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT
Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
