These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23001715)
1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening method for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Littlejohn C; Hilton S; Macfarlane GJ; Phull P Br J Surg; 2012 Nov; 99(11):1488-500. PubMed ID: 23001715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer with flexible-sigmoidoscopy screening: a meta-analysis. Shroff J; Thosani N; Batra S; Singh H; Guha S World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(48):18466-76. PubMed ID: 25561818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Elmunzer BJ; Hayward RA; Schoenfeld PS; Saini SD; Deshpande A; Waljee AK PLoS Med; 2012; 9(12):e1001352. PubMed ID: 23226108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized controlled trial: Flexible sigmoidoscopy as an adjunct to faecal occult blood testing in population screening. Steele RJ; Carey FA; Stanners G; Lang J; Brand J; Brownlee LA; Crichton EM; Winter JW; Phull PS; Mowat C; Strachan JA; Digan AM; Fraser CG J Med Screen; 2020 Jun; 27(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 31690179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preventing colorectal cancer or early diagnosis: Which is best? A re-analysis of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Report. Swartz AW; Eberth JM; Strayer SM Prev Med; 2019 Jan; 118():104-112. PubMed ID: 30367971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies. Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Lin JS; Piper MA; Perdue LA; Rutter CM; Webber EM; O'Connor E; Smith N; Whitlock EP JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2576-94. PubMed ID: 27305422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Ali MU; Warren R; Kenny M; Sherifali D; Raina P Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Dec; 15(4):298-313. PubMed ID: 27133893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention. Emilsson L; Holme Ø; Bretthauer M; Cook NR; Buring JE; Løberg M; Adami HO; Sesso HD; Gaziano MJ; Kalager M Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Jan; 45(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 27859394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time to benefit for colorectal cancer screening: survival meta-analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy trials. Tang V; Boscardin WJ; Stijacic-Cenzer I; Lee SJ BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1662. PubMed ID: 25881903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current status of screening for colorectal cancer. Garborg K; Holme Ø; Løberg M; Kalager M; Adami HO; Bretthauer M Ann Oncol; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1963-72. PubMed ID: 23619033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic yield in a biennial Hemoccult-II screening program compared to a once-only screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy and Hemoccult-II. Rasmussen M; Fenger C; Kronborg O Scand J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jan; 38(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 12608473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening and primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a review of sex-specific and site-specific differences. Massat NJ; Moss SM; Halloran SP; Duffy SW J Med Screen; 2013; 20(3):125-48. PubMed ID: 24197771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis. Zhang J; Cheng Z; Ma Y; He C; Lu Y; Zhao Y; Chang X; Zhang Y; Bai Y; Cheng N Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Dec; 16(4):252-263. PubMed ID: 28687458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Number of Adenomas Removed and Colorectal Cancers Prevented in Randomized Trials of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening. Pinsky PF; Loberg M; Senore C; Wooldrage K; Atkin W; Bretthauer M; Cross AJ; Hoff G; Holme O; Kalager M; Segnan N; Schoen RE Gastroenterology; 2018 Oct; 155(4):1059-1068.e2. PubMed ID: 29935150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review of the effectiveness of population screening for colorectal cancer. Kerr J; Day P; Broadstock M; Weir R; Bidwell S N Z Med J; 2007 Jul; 120(1258):U2629. PubMed ID: 17653247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial). Denis B; Gendre I; Aman F; Ribstein F; Maurin P; Perrin P Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3282-90. PubMed ID: 19665368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]