184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23001876)
1. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance.
Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery.
Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor.
Brunelli E; Youssef A; Soliman EM; Del Prete B; Mahmoud MH; Fikry M; Pilu G; Kamel RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):81.e1-81.e9. PubMed ID: 33508312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station.
Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 23355510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery.
Ciaciura-Jarno M; Cnota W; Wójtowicz D; Niesłuchowska-Hoxha A; Ruci A; Kierach R; Stępień A; Nowak A; Sodowska P
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 27418223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.
Eggebø TM; Hassan WA; Salvesen KÅ; Lindtjørn E; Lees CC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 24105705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women.
Perlman S; Raviv-Zilka L; Levinsky D; Gidron A; Achiron R; Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(19):3255-3265. PubMed ID: 29621904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Maroni E; Arcangeli T; De Musso F; Bellussi F; Nanni M; Giorgetta F; Morselli-Labate AM; Iammarino MT; Paccapelo A; Cariello L; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 23288706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual biofeedback using transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor.
Gilboa Y; Frenkel TI; Schlesinger Y; Rousseau S; Hamiel D; Achiron R; Perlman S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 29155474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor.
Yonetani N; Yamamoto R; Murata M; Nakajima E; Taguchi T; Ishii K; Mitsuda N
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):246-251. PubMed ID: 27089836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pubic Arch Angle Measurement by Transperineal Ultrasonography: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 42(4):181-187. PubMed ID: 32330959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor.
Youssef A; Maroni E; Cariello L; Bellussi F; Montaguti E; Salsi G; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Ghi T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25040777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there an association between sonographically determined occipito-transverse position in the second stage of labor and operative delivery?
Phipps H; Hyett JA; Graham K; Carseldine WJ; Tooher J; de Vries B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 25060716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Levator hiatus dimensions in late pregnancy and the process of labor: a 3- and 4-dimensional transperineal ultrasound study.
Siafarikas F; Stær-Jensen J; Hilde G; Bø K; Ellström Engh M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):484.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24569040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The "occiput-spine angle": a new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor.
Ghi T; Bellussi F; Azzarone C; Krsmanovic J; Franchi L; Youssef A; Lenzi J; Fantini MP; Frusca T; Pilu G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):84.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26880733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
