184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23001876)
21. Angle of Progression on Ultrasound in the Second Stage of Labor and Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery.
Bibbo C; Rouse CE; Cantonwine DE; Little SE; McElrath TF; Robinson JN
Am J Perinatol; 2018 Mar; 35(4):413-420. PubMed ID: 29112996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nassr AA; Berghella V; Hessami K; Bibbo C; Bellussi F; Robinson JN; Marsoosi V; Tabrizi R; Safari-Faramani R; Tolcher MC; Shamshirsaz AA; Clark SL; Belfort MA; Shamshirsaz AA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):205-214.e2. PubMed ID: 34384775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Traditionally vs sonographically coached pushing in second stage of labor: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Bellussi F; Alcamisi L; Guizzardi G; Parma D; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 29532533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of 'angle of progression' in prediction of delivery mode.
Marsoosi V; Pirjani R; Mansouri B; Eslamian L; Jamal A; Heidari R; Rahimi-Foroushani A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1693-9. PubMed ID: 26370603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound.
Barbera AF; Pombar X; Perugino G; Lezotte DC; Hobbins JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 19248000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Martelli F; Bellussi F; Aiello E; Pilu G; Rizzo N; Frusca T; Arduini D; Rizzo G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 48(4):511-515. PubMed ID: 26565728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women.
Sainz JA; Borrero C; Fernández-Palacín A; Aquise A; Valdivieso P; Pastor L; Garrido R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015; 28(17):2041-7. PubMed ID: 25327175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor.
Chan VYT; Lau WL; So MKP; Leung WC
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 144(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 30430566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Time remaining in labor and probability of vaginal delivery as a function of the angle of progression in a low risk population with a normal first stage of labor. In-house observational study and comparison with the data in the literature.
Masturzo B; Piazzese A; Paracchini S; Quezada MS; Todros T; Farina A
Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Feb; 70(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28590104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal.
Youssef A; Brunelli E; Fiorentini M; Lenzi J; Pilu G; El-Balat A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 58(4):609-615. PubMed ID: 33847431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Measuring the angle of the subpubic arch using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound scan: intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility.
Choi S; Chan SS; Sahota DS; Leung TY
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 22875664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head-perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery.
Chan YT; Ng VK; Yung WK; Lo TK; Leung WC; Lau WL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1476-81. PubMed ID: 25163523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intrapartum ultrasound monitoring of malposition and malrotation during labor neuraxial analgesia: maternal outcomes.
Malvasi A; Raimondo P; Beck R; Tinelli A; Kuczkowski KM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Nov; 33(21):3584-3590. PubMed ID: 30782016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound.
Bamberg C; Scheuermann S; Slowinski T; Dückelmann AM; Vogt M; Nguyen-Dobinsky TN; Streitparth F; Teichgräber U; Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 21308830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correlation between Subpubic Arch Angle and Mode of Delivery in Large-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
Ghi T; Dall'Asta A; Suprani A; Aiello E; Musarò A; Bosi C; Pedrazzi G; Kiener A; Arduini D; Frusca T; Rizzo G
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 44(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 29232667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 21630362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography.
Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(14):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31505974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automatic ultrasound technique to measure angle of progression during labor.
Conversano F; Peccarisi M; Pisani P; Di Paola M; De Marco T; Franchini R; Greco A; D'Ambrogio G; Casciaro S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 50(6):766-775. PubMed ID: 28233418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of sonographic assessment of the progress of labor.
Głuszak M; Dziadecki W; Wielgoś M; Węgrzyn P
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Feb; 86(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 25807837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
