214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23002059)
41. Responsiveness of acoustic rhinometry to septorhinoplasty by comparison with rhinomanometry and subjective instruments.
Ansari E; Rogister F; Lefebvre P; Tombu S; Poirrier AL
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Sep; 44(5):778-783. PubMed ID: 31220404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Nasal congestion index: A measure for nasal obstruction.
Kjaergaard T; Cvancarova M; Steinsvåg SK
Laryngoscope; 2009 Aug; 119(8):1628-32. PubMed ID: 19507219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.
Naito K; Miyata S; Saito S; Sakurai K; Takeuchi K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 258(10):505-8. PubMed ID: 11829185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Peak nasal inspiratory flowmeter in evaluation of nasal obstruction].
Ozturan O; Gürdal MM
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2010; 20(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 20465543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Assessing the relationship between serum resistin and nasal obstruction in children with allergic rhinitis.
Zicari AM; Occasi F; Cesoni Marcelli A; Marcelli AC; Lollobrigida V; Carbone MP; Galandrini R; Giuffrida A; Duse M
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2013; 27(5):e127-30. PubMed ID: 24119593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Correlation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.
Kim CS; Moon BK; Jung DH; Min YG
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Jan; 25(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 9512794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of nasal patency by visual analogue scale/nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaires and anterior active rhinomanometry after septoplasty: a retrospective one-year follow-up cohort study.
Hsu HC; Tan CD; Chang CW; Chu CW; Chiu YC; Pan CJ; Huang HM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 42(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27102375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Clinical significance of acoustic rhinometry and nasal resistance checks in the efficacy evaluation of low temperature radiofrequency ablation by nasal endoscopy].
Yin Z; Liu G; Zhang J
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(23):1296-9, 1302. PubMed ID: 24620658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Sensation of nasal patency compared to rhinomanometric results after septoplasty.
Tompos T; Garai T; Zemplén B; Gerlinger I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 267(12):1887-91. PubMed ID: 20544355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Acoustic rhinometry: measuring the early and late phase of allergic immediate reaction in allergic rhinitis].
Rasp G
Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Mar; 72(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 8471095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence.
Hopkins C; Earnshaw J; Roberts D
Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 20738348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Does nasal breathing cause frictional trauma in allergic rhinitis?
Singh V; Chowdhary R; Chowdhary N
J Assoc Physicians India; 2000 May; 48(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 11273143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of measurement of acoustic rhinometry applied to small experimental animals.
Kaise T; Ukai K; Pedersen OF; Sakakura Y
Am J Rhinol; 1999; 13(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 10219441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. An interpretation method for objective assessment of nasal congestion with acoustic rhinometry.
Mamikoglu B; Houser SM; Corey JP
Laryngoscope; 2002 May; 112(5):926-9. PubMed ID: 12150630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Peak nasal inspiratory flow evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow.
Teixeira RUF; Zappelini CEM; Alves FS; da Costa EA
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 21860974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Nasal airway volume and resistance to airflow.
Zhang G; Solomon P; Rival R; Fenton RS; Cole P
Am J Rhinol; 2008; 22(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 18702900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of optical rhinometry to acoustic rhinometry using nasal provocation testing with Dermatophagoides farinae.
Cheung EJ; Citardi MJ; Fakhri S; Cain J; Batra PS; Luong A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Aug; 143(2):290-3. PubMed ID: 20647137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Nasal patency in children with allergic rhinitis: correlation of objective and subjective assessments.
Watson WT; Roberts JR; Becker AB; Gendreau-Reid LF; Simons FE
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Mar; 74(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 7889379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Validation of a cadaveric model for comprehensive physiologic and anatomic evaluation of rhinoplastic techniques.
Coan BS; Neff E; Mukundan S; Marcus JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Dec; 124(6):2107-2117. PubMed ID: 19952668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Correlation between subjective and objective nasal breathing assessments in examinees with nasal septum deformities.
Savović S; Smajić M; Molnar S; Jovancević L; Buljcik-Cupić M; Kljajić V; Pilija V
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Apr; 70(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 23700942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
