These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23002451)

  • 1. Through the gaps.
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):335. PubMed ID: 23002451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repairing research integrity.
    Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stop ignoring misconduct.
    Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retraction record rocks community.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):346-7. PubMed ID: 22996524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solutions, not scapegoats.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):957. PubMed ID: 18563095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misconduct mayhem.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):122-3. PubMed ID: 16721916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A record made to be broken.
    Nature; 2013 Apr; 496(7443):5. PubMed ID: 23565534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US free-speech law offers protection--at a price.
    Samuel Reich E
    Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7338):276-7. PubMed ID: 21412304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
    Bentley P
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
    Hadi MA
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bad press.
    Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7422):7-8. PubMed ID: 23136647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why we should reward peer reviewers.
    Maffia P
    Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Apr; 114(5):e30-e31. PubMed ID: 29590390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
    Sovacool BK
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reprogramming rush.
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7186):388. PubMed ID: 18368078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.