147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2300356)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging in stage I endometrial carcinoma.
Chen SS; Rumancik WM; Spiegel G
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 75(2):274-7. PubMed ID: 2300356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma.
Ben-Shachar I; Pavelka J; Cohn DE; Copeland LJ; Ramirez N; Manolitsas T; Fowler JM
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):487-93. PubMed ID: 15738013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative assessment of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic evaluation.
Vasconcelos C; Félix A; Cunha TM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jan; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17365463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing myometrial invasion absence in endometrial carcinoma.
Suh DS; Kim JK; Kim KR; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(9):990-3. PubMed ID: 19636979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre.
Ortashi O; Jain S; Emannuel O; Henry R; Wood A; Evans J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 17537566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endometrial carcinoma: the relevance of cervical cytology.
DuBeshter B; Warshal DP; Angel C; Dvoretsky PM; Lin JY; Raubertas RF
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Mar; 77(3):458-62. PubMed ID: 1992417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of deep endometrial invasion for patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Hwang JH; Lee NW; Lee KW; Lee JK
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19780740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the sentinel node procedure to stage endometrial cancer.
Ballester M; Dubernard G; Rouzier R; Barranger E; Darai E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1523-9. PubMed ID: 18322758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion in stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Doering DL; Barnhill DR; Weiser EB; Burke TW; Woodward JE; Park RC
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Dec; 74(6):930-3. PubMed ID: 2586959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and cause of pitfalls in detecting myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer.
Sanjuán A; Escaramís G; Ayuso JR; Román SM; Torné A; Ordi J; Lejárcegui JA; Pahisa J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Dec; 278(6):535-9. PubMed ID: 18368415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer.
Tong T; Yajia G; Huaying W; Weijun P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):1113-8. PubMed ID: 21898079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma.
Chambers JT; Merino M; Kohorn EI; Peschel RE; Schwartz PE
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 3796910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR imaging in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the absence of myometrial invasion.
Nakao Y; Yokoyama M; Hara K; Koyamatsu Y; Yasunaga M; Araki Y; Watanabe Y; Iwasaka T
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):343-7. PubMed ID: 16469365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging performs better than endocervical curettage for preoperative prediction of cervical stromal invasion in endometrial carcinomas.
Haldorsen IS; Berg A; Werner HM; Magnussen IJ; Helland H; Salvesen OO; Trovik J; Salvesen HB
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 22609110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.
Boronow RC; Morrow CP; Creasman WT; Disaia PJ; Silverberg SG; Miller A; Blessing JA
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jun; 63(6):825-32. PubMed ID: 6728365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging of endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Barwick TD; Rockall AG; Barton DP; Sohaib SA
Clin Radiol; 2006 Jul; 61(7):545-55. PubMed ID: 16784939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extended surgical staging for uterine papillary serous carcinoma: survival outcome of locoregional (Stage I-III) disease.
Bristow RE; Asrari F; Trimble EL; Montz FJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 11330963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the extent of myometrial infiltration for patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Rieck GC; Bulman J; Whitaker R; Leeson SC
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Nov; 25(8):765-8. PubMed ID: 16368581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of gross myometrial invasion with endometrial cancer.
Larson DM; Connor GP; Broste SK; Krawisz BR; Johnson KK
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 8752246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
