These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23004942)
1. Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem. Schlosshauer M; Fine A Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Jun; 108(26):260404. PubMed ID: 23004942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No-go theorem for the composition of quantum systems. Schlosshauer M; Fine A Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Feb; 112(7):070407. PubMed ID: 24579576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No ψ-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states. Barrett J; Cavalcanti EG; Lal R; Maroney OJ Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Jun; 112(25):250403. PubMed ID: 25014796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From the Kochen-Specker theorem to noncontextuality inequalities without assuming determinism. Kunjwal R; Spekkens RW Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Sep; 115(11):110403. PubMed ID: 26406812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Simplified Basis for Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorems. Malley JD; Fine A Phys Lett A; 2014 Jul; 378(35):2611-2613. PubMed ID: 25197159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption. Patra MK; Pironio S; Massar S Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Aug; 111(9):090402. PubMed ID: 24033005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hidden Variable Model for Universal Quantum Computation with Magic States on Qubits. Zurel M; Okay C; Raussendorf R Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Dec; 125(26):260404. PubMed ID: 33449740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality. Leifer MS; Maroney OJ Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Mar; 110(12):120401. PubMed ID: 25166779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binary quantum random number generator based on value indefinite observables. Calude CS; Svozil K Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):12845. PubMed ID: 38834594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental test of the Kochen-Specker theorem with single photons. Huang YF; Li CF; Zhang YS; Pan JW; Guo GC Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Jun; 90(25 Pt 1):250401. PubMed ID: 12857117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limits to quantum mechanics as a source of magic tricks: Retrodiction and the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem. Mermin ND Phys Rev Lett; 1995 Feb; 74(6):831-834. PubMed ID: 10058860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Communication Tasks with Infinite Quantum-Classical Separation. Perry C; Jain R; Oppenheim J Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Jul; 115(3):030504. PubMed ID: 26230777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality? Colbeck R; Renner R Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Apr; 108(15):150402. PubMed ID: 22587234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "All versus nothing" inseparability for two observers. Cabello A Phys Rev Lett; 2001 Jul; 87(1):010403. PubMed ID: 11461451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generalized Bell Scenarios: Disturbing Consequences on Local-Hidden-Variable Models. Mazzari A; Ruffolo G; Vieira C; Temistocles T; Rabelo R; Terra Cunha M Entropy (Basel); 2023 Aug; 25(9):. PubMed ID: 37761575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A possible loophole in the theorem of Bell. Hess K; Philipp W Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Dec; 98(25):14224-7. PubMed ID: 11724941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proof of the Peres Conjecture for Contextuality. Xu ZP; Chen JL; Gühne O Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jun; 124(23):230401. PubMed ID: 32603161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]