These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23006502)

  • 1. The effects of insertion speed on inner ear function during cochlear implantation: a comparison study.
    Rajan GP; Kontorinis G; Kuthubutheen J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23006502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing preservation and hearing improvement after reimplantation of pediatric and adult patients with partial deafness: a retrospective case series review.
    Jayawardena J; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan G
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):740-4. PubMed ID: 22699985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implantation: is hearing preservation necessary in severe to profound hearing loss?
    Derinsu U; Serin GM; Akdaş F; Batman Ç
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 21403538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of preoperative, intratympanic glucocorticoids for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: a prospective clinical study.
    Rajan GP; Kuthubutheen J; Hedne N; Krishnaswamy J
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jan; 122(1):190-5. PubMed ID: 22183635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.
    Nguyen Y; Mosnier I; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Ferrary E; Sterkers O
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 133(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 23216055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion on middle-ear function as measured by intra-operative laser Doppler vibrometry.
    Donnelly N; Bibas A; Jiang D; Bamiou DE; Santulli C; Jeronimidis G; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 19138455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
    Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deep round window insertion versus standard approach in cochlear implant surgery.
    Nordfalk KF; Rasmussen K; Bunne M; Jablonski GE
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jan; 273(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 25549811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atraumatic round window deep insertion of cochlear electrodes.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Zgoda M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski PH; Szkielkowska A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 131(7):740-9. PubMed ID: 21492068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes review of modern hearing preservation technique in cochlear implant.
    Nguyen S; Cloutier F; Philippon D; Côté M; Bussières R; Backous DD
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2016 Oct; 43(5):485-8. PubMed ID: 26976547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing preservation surgery for cochlear implantation: a meta-analysis.
    Santa Maria PL; Gluth MB; Yuan Y; Atlas MD; Blevins NH
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e256-69. PubMed ID: 25233333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations.
    Cinar BC; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing Preservation With a Midscalar Electrode Comparison of a Regular and Steroid/Pressure Optimized Surgical Approach in Patients With Residual Hearing.
    Todt I; Mittmann P; Ernst A
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e349-52. PubMed ID: 27631658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of a cochlear implant electrode on the mechanical function of the inner ear.
    Huber AM; Hoon SJ; Sharouz B; Daniel B; Albrecht E
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 20061991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preserved low-frequency hearing following 20-mm cochlear implantation.
    Brown KD; Melton MF; Shonfield H; Kraskin M; Wolf J
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 25569364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the insertion speed of cochlear implant electrodes on the insertion forces.
    Kontorinis G; Lenarz T; Stöver T; Paasche G
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):565-70. PubMed ID: 21478788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 2, Surgical and Device-Related Practice Patterns.
    Carlson ML; O'Connell BP; Lohse CM; Driscoll CL; Sweeney AD
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e20-e27. PubMed ID: 29210943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.