174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23006522)
1. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
Hanly P; Skally M; Fenlon H; Sharp L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Oct; 28(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 23006522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Morini S
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2213-21. PubMed ID: 17455218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost effectiveness of fecal DNA screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the literature.
Skally M; Hanly P; Sharp L
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 23549792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 3-D computerized tomography colonography versus optical colonoscopy for imaging symptomatic gastroenterology patients.
Gomes M; Aldridge RW; Wylie P; Bell J; Epstein O
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 23512599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening on the UK NHS: costs, healthcare resources and health outcomes.
Sweet A; Lee D; Gairy K; Phiri D; Reason T; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 21174482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG; Boer R; Wilschut J; Habbema JD
Int J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 124(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 19048626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.
Allameh Z; Davari M; Emami MH
Arch Iran Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 21361717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy.
Heresbach D; Chauvin P; Hess-Migliorretti A; Riou F; Grolier J; Josselin JM
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Jun; 22(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19574924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Kim DH; Zullo A; Iafrate F; Di Giulio L; Morini S
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Apr; 168(7):696-705. PubMed ID: 18413551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
