These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23006677)

  • 1. Analysis of the distribution of bacteria within urinary catheter biofilms using four different molecular techniques.
    Choe HS; Son SW; Choi HA; Kim HJ; Ahn SG; Bang JH; Lee SJ; Lee JY; Cho YH; Lee SS
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 Nov; 40(9):e249-54. PubMed ID: 23006677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of bacterial biofilms formed on urinary catheters.
    Djeribi R; Bouchloukh W; Jouenne T; Menaa B
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 Nov; 40(9):854-9. PubMed ID: 22325732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the bacterial distribution within the biofilm by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in the rat model of urinary catheters.
    Choe HS; Kim HJ; Lee SJ; Lee JY; Lee SS; Cho YH
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2013 Jun; 45(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 23563867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diversity analysis of biofilm bacteria on tracheal tubes removed from intubated neonates].
    Song C; Yu JL; Ai Q; Liu D; Lu W; Lu Q; Peng NN
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 51(8):602-6. PubMed ID: 24225292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterisation of prototype Nurmi cultures using culture-based microbiological techniques and PCR-DGGE.
    Waters SM; Murphy RA; Power RF
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 110(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 16814892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Culture-dependent and -independent investigations of microbial diversity on urinary catheters.
    Xu Y; Moser C; Al-Soud WA; Sørensen S; Høiby N; Nielsen PH; Thomsen TR
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 50(12):3901-8. PubMed ID: 23015674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compositions of maple sap microflora and collection system biofilms evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.
    Lagacé L; Jacques M; Mafu AA; Roy D
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 May; 109(1-2):9-18. PubMed ID: 16515815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of bacterial community associated to biofilms of corroded oil pipelines from the southeast of Mexico.
    Neria-González I; Wang ET; Ramírez F; Romero JM; Hernández-Rodríguez C
    Anaerobe; 2006 Jun; 12(3):122-33. PubMed ID: 16765858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biofilm Development on Urinary Catheters Promotes the Appearance of Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria.
    Wilks SA; Koerfer VV; Prieto JA; Fader M; Keevil CW
    mBio; 2021 Mar; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33758085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 16S rDNA-based identification of bacteria from conjunctival swabs by PCR and DGGE fingerprinting.
    Schabereiter-Gurtner C; Maca S; Rölleke S; Nigl K; Lukas J; Hirschl A; Lubitz W; Barisani-Asenbauer T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1164-71. PubMed ID: 11328723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biofilm evidence and the microbial diversity of horse wounds.
    Freeman K; Woods E; Welsby S; Percival SL; Cochrane CA
    Can J Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 19295652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of bacterial diversity in river biofilms using 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE: methodological settings and fingerprints interpretation.
    Lyautey E; Lacoste B; Ten-Hage L; Rols JL; Garabetian F
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):380-8. PubMed ID: 15644246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Virulence factors in Proteus spp. bacteria isolated from urinary tract infections: their detection and importance].
    Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2011 Aug; 17(4):129-34. PubMed ID: 22052099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbial diversity in biofilm infections of the urinary tract with the use of sonication techniques.
    Holá V; Ruzicka F; Horka M
    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 59(3):525-8. PubMed ID: 20602639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biofilm bacterial communities and abundance in a full-scale drinking water distribution system in Shanghai.
    Bai X; Wu F; Zhou B; Zhi X
    J Water Health; 2010 Sep; 8(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 20375488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biofilm formation with mixed cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa/Escherichia coli on silicone using artificial urine to mimic urinary catheters.
    Cerqueira L; Oliveira JA; Nicolau A; Azevedo NF; Vieira MJ
    Biofouling; 2013; 29(7):829-40. PubMed ID: 23837894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of triclosan on the development of bacterial biofilms by urinary tract pathogens on urinary catheters.
    Jones GL; Muller CT; O'Reilly M; Stickler DJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 Feb; 57(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 16339844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction between atypical microorganisms and E. coli in catheter-associated urinary tract biofilms.
    Azevedo AS; Almeida C; Melo LF; Azevedo NF
    Biofouling; 2014 Sep; 30(8):893-902. PubMed ID: 25184430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endotracheal tube biofilm inoculation of oral flora and subsequent colonization of opportunistic pathogens.
    Perkins SD; Woeltje KF; Angenent LT
    Int J Med Microbiol; 2010 Nov; 300(7):503-11. PubMed ID: 20510651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Yeast colonization of urinary catheters and the significance of biofilm formation].
    Růžička F; Holá V; Mahelová M; Procházková A
    Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2012 Aug; 18(4):115-9. PubMed ID: 23172023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.