These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23007738)

  • 1. A stage-wise approach for the analysis of multi-environment trials.
    Piepho HP; Möhring J; Schulz-Streeck T; Ogutu JO
    Biom J; 2012 Nov; 54(6):844-60. PubMed ID: 23007738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing multi-environment variety trials using randomization-derived mixed models.
    Caliński T; Czajka S; Kaczmarek Z; Krajewski P; Pilarczyk W
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 16011691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric bootstrap methods for testing multiplicative terms in GGE and AMMI models.
    Forkman J; Piepho HP
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):639-47. PubMed ID: 24588726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General formulas for obtaining the MLEs and the asymptotic variance-covariance matrix in mapping quantitative trait loci when using the EM algorithm.
    Kao CH; Zeng ZB
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):653-65. PubMed ID: 9192455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impacts of QTL x environment interactions on genetic response to marker-assisted selection.
    Liu PY; Zhu J; Yan L
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Jan; 33(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 16450589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjusting for covariates in variance components QTL linkage analysis.
    Zeegers M; Rijsdijk F; Sham P
    Behav Genet; 2004 Mar; 34(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 14755177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nearest neighbour adjustment and linear variance models in plant breeding trials.
    Piepho HP; Richter C; Williams E
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):164-89. PubMed ID: 18383446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci underlying endosperm traits using all markers on the entire genome in a random hybridization design.
    He XH; Zhang YM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Jul; 101(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18461088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Index selection on seed traits under direct, cytoplasmic and maternal effects in multiple environments.
    Zhang W; Xu H; Zhu J
    J Genet Genomics; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19161944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of methods incorporating quantitative covariates into affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Tsai HJ; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 16355406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular mapping and breeding with microsatellite markers.
    Lightfoot DA; Iqbal MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1006():297-317. PubMed ID: 23546799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gene-environment interactions in complex diseases: genetic models and methods for QTL mapping in multiple half-sib populations.
    Kadarmideen HN; Li Y; Janss LL
    Genet Res; 2006 Oct; 88(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 16978428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting body conformation traits in Spanish Churra dairy sheep.
    Gutiérrez-Gil B; Alvarez L; de la Fuente LF; Sanchez JP; San Primitivo F; Arranz JJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4119-28. PubMed ID: 21787947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of single-stage and two-stage approaches to genomic selection.
    Schulz-Streeck T; Ogutu JO; Piepho HP
    Theor Appl Genet; 2013 Jan; 126(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22903736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend.
    Smith A; Cullis B; Thompson R
    Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1138-47. PubMed ID: 11764254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling QTL for complex traits: detection and context for plant breeding.
    Cooper M; van Eeuwijk FA; Hammer GL; Podlich DW; Messina C
    Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2009 Apr; 12(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 19282235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
    Mathew T; Nordström K
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-iterative variance component estimation in QTL analysis.
    Rönnegård L; Al-Sarraj R; von Rosen D
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Apr; 126(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 19320767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.