These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2300793)

  • 1. [The border seal in restorations of class-V lesions with glass ionomer cement and composite (the sandwich filling)].
    Hänggi D; Hefti AF; Rateitschak KH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 2300793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations.
    van Dijken JW
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1994 Dec; 52(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 7887146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Glass ionomer cement and "sandwich" restorations after two years of clinical service].
    Reich E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Feb; 46(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 1814714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.
    Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Barbosa SH; Lauris JR; Franco EB
    J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 14682645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage at the gingival margin of class II composite restorations with glass-ionomer liner.
    Hembree JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 2915330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Marginal gaps of combined composite and glass ionomer cement fillings in different preparations in vitro].
    Reich E; Völkl H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 2630263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
    Mason PN; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental secondary caries around amalgam, composite and glass ionomer cement fillings in human teeth.
    Hotz PR
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Sep; 89(9):965-86. PubMed ID: 293928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.