133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23008497)
1. Uncertainty Over DAT Testing.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Oct; 104(19):1427-8. PubMed ID: 23008497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consumer alert: ethical issues raised by the sale of genetic tests directly to consumers.
Wasson K
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 18726774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The FDA's perspective on clinical laboratory devices. The premarket review and evaluation process.
Aziz KJ; Sliva CA; Gutman SI
Am Clin Lab; 1996; 15(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10163487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. FDA warning on HIV tests purchased on the Internet.
Rose VL
Am Fam Physician; 1999 Sep; 60(3):1026, 1029. PubMed ID: 10498126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid testing for HIV: why so fast?
Kane B
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Sep; 131(6):481-3. PubMed ID: 10498576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New screen could 'change the prognosis' for ovarian cancer.
Dis Manag Advis; 2003 Jan; 9(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12619292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing for HIV infection at home.
Bayer R; Stryker J; Smith MD
N Engl J Med; 1995 May; 332(19):1296-9. PubMed ID: 7708077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The US Food and Drug Administration perspective on cancer biomarker development.
Gutman S; Kessler LG
Nat Rev Cancer; 2006 Jul; 6(7):565-71. PubMed ID: 16794639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDA to regulate direct-to-consumer genetic tests.
Brower V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Nov; 102(21):1610-2, 1617. PubMed ID: 20966430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal overview of likely FDA regulation of Internet promotion.
Scheineson MJ
Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):697-716. PubMed ID: 11797736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Home testing to detect human immunodeficiency virus: boon or bane?
Campbell S; Klein R
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):3473-6. PubMed ID: 17021069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposed HIV home testing kit draws applause and brickbats.
AIDS Policy Law; 1994 Dec; 9(23):4. PubMed ID: 12166382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility.
Robson ME; Storm CD; Weitzel J; Wollins DS; Offit K;
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 28(5):893-901. PubMed ID: 20065170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. FDA weighing feasibility of at-home testing for AIDS virus.
AIDS Read; 2005 Nov; 15(11):574. PubMed ID: 16331828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic tests forge ahead, despite scientific concerns.
Marshall A
Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Dec; 14(13):1642-3. PubMed ID: 9634835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New challenges for medical product promotion and its regulation.
Pines WL
Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 10346710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A change in the market--investing in diagnostics.
Batchelder K; Miller P
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 24(8):922-6. PubMed ID: 16900131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical device regulation in the United States and the European Union: a comparative study.
Chai JY
Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 12296349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. FDA and CLIA oversight of advanced diagnostics and biomarker tests.
Terry SF
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):285-7. PubMed ID: 20578940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. FDA halts 23andMe personal genetic tests. What might this mean for the future of direct-to-consumer testing?
Darnovsky M; Cussins J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2014 Mar; 46(3):33. PubMed ID: 24696953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
