These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23008838)

  • 1. Women in engineering.
    Liu Z
    IEEE Pulse; 2012 Jul; 3(4):6, 8. PubMed ID: 23008838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific community. No sexism in science? Not so fast, critics say.
    Bernstein R
    Science; 2014 Nov; 346(6211):798. PubMed ID: 25395513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supporting female scientists in Yemen.
    Zakham F; Jaton K
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):526-527. PubMed ID: 30739683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Athena SWAN and ADVANCE: effectiveness and lessons learned.
    Rosser SV; Barnard S; Carnes M; Munir F
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):604-608. PubMed ID: 30739697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Australia's strategy to achieve gender equality in STEM.
    Latimer J; Cerise S; Ovseiko PV; Rathborne JM; Billiards SS; El-Adhami W
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):524-526. PubMed ID: 30739682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia.
    Shaw AK; Stanton DE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Sep; 279(1743):3736-41. PubMed ID: 22719028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Self-efficacy and the gender gap as determinants of interest in a science and technology career].
    Adachi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Dec; 83(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 23379086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "It's Wrong to Exclude Girls From Something They Love." Adolescents' Attitudes About Sexism in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
    Robnett RD; John JE
    Child Dev; 2020 Jan; 91(1):e231-e248. PubMed ID: 30414171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driving gender equity in African scientific institutions.
    Tiedeu BA; Para-Mallam OJ; Nyambi D
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):504-506. PubMed ID: 30739672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder.
    Handley IM; Brown ER; Moss-Racusin CA; Smith JL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(43):13201-6. PubMed ID: 26460001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Actionable equality.
    Nat Med; 2018 Jul; 24(7):881. PubMed ID: 29988141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unstable identity compatibility: how gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.
    Ahlqvist S; London B; Rosenthal L
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1644-52. PubMed ID: 23818652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeking congruity between goals and roles: a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers.
    Diekman AB; Brown ER; Johnston AM; Clark EK
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1051-7. PubMed ID: 20631322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. WOMEN AND SCIENCE.
    Jones CG; Hawkins S
    Notes Rec R Soc Lond; 2015 Mar; 69(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 26489179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advancing women in STEM: institutional transformation.
    Shaw SM; Bothwell M; Furman K; Gaines L; John D; Lopez C; Osei-Kofi N; Özkan-Haller HT; Plaza D; Ruder B; Warner RL
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):e17-e18. PubMed ID: 30739702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The missing trans women of science, medicine, and global health.
    Restar AJ; Operario D
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):506-508. PubMed ID: 30739673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When trying hard isn't natural: women's belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns.
    Smith JL; Lewis KL; Hawthorne L; Hodges SD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Feb; 39(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 23187722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
    Wang MT; Eccles JS; Kenny S
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 23508740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The good, the bad, and the ugly of implicit bias.
    Pritlove C; Juando-Prats C; Ala-Leppilampi K; Parsons JA
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):502-504. PubMed ID: 30739671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
    Wang MT; Ye F; Degol JL
    J Youth Adolesc; 2017 Aug; 46(8):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 27975183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.