271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23009074)
1. Goldmann applanation tonometry compared with corneal-compensated intraocular pressure in the evaluation of primary open-angle Glaucoma.
Ehrlich JR; Radcliffe NM; Shimmyo M
BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 12():52. PubMed ID: 23009074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D
J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.
Vinciguerra R; Rehman S; Vallabh NA; Batterbury M; Czanner G; Choudhary A; Cheeseman R; Elsheikh A; Willoughby CE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Costin BR; Fleming GP; Weber PA; Mahmoud AM; Roberts CJ
J Glaucoma; 2014 Feb; 23(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 23603825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4410-4. PubMed ID: 17003433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals.
Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC
Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry.
Güngör SG; Akman A; Yazici AC
J Glaucoma; 2015 Aug; 24(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 24145288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
