276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23009074)
21. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in chinese subjects with primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Narayanaswamy A; Su DH; Baskaran M; Tan AC; Nongpiur ME; Htoon HM; Wong TY; Aung T
Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 129(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 21482869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Hautenauven F; Pourjavan S
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21989354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraocular pressure measurements in diabetes mellitus.
Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1432-1439. PubMed ID: 31779470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Realini T; Weinreb RN; Hobbs G
J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 19225347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M
J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.
Ang GS; Bochmann F; Townend J; Azuara-Blanco A
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 18552609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.
Zhang Y; Bian A; Hang Q; Li L; Zhang S; Cheng G; Zhou Q
Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):749-756. PubMed ID: 36958304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Trabeculectomy and the Impact on Intraocular Pressure Measurement.
Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE
J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):278-282. PubMed ID: 27977478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.
Hardin JS; Lee CI; Lane LF; Hester CC; Morshedi RG
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 256(10):1971-1976. PubMed ID: 30039270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.
Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
J Glaucoma; 2006 Oct; 15(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 16988597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma patients.
Beyazyıldız E; Beyazyıldız O; Arifoğlu HB; Altıntaş AK; Köklü SG
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 62(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25116770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results.
Abd Elaziz MS; Elsobky HM; Zaky AG; Hassan EAM; KhalafAllah MT
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):172. PubMed ID: 31391006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Non-Contact and Contact Tonometry in Corneal Edema.
Gür Güngör S; Akman A; Küçüködük A; Asena L; Şimşek C; Yazici AC
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jan; 93(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 26583789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
