276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23009074)
61. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The impact of chronic use of prostaglandin analogues on the biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Meda R; Wang Q; Paoloni D; Harasymowycz P; Brunette I
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 101(2):120-125. PubMed ID: 27162226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Investigation of corneal biomechanics at moderate to high refractive errors.
İnceoğlu N; Emre S; Ulusoy MO
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 28540493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Comparison between different tonometers following intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation.
Elfwwal MM; Elbasty MK; Khattab MF; ElShazly MI
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 34472983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Patients With Thyroid Eye Disease Using Ocular Response Analyzer.
Moghimi S; Safizadeh M; Mazloumi M; Hosseini H; Vahedian Z; Rajabi MT
J Glaucoma; 2016 Mar; 25(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 26020688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Surgically induced changes in corneal viscoelastic properties after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy using ocular response analyzer.
Seymenoğlu G; Uzun Ö; Başer E
Curr Eye Res; 2013 Jan; 38(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22799272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Relationship of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure by iCare rebound tonometer.
Rao A; Kumar M; Prakash B; Varshney G
J Glaucoma; 2014 Aug; 23(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 23221904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Influence of Corneal Opacity on Intraocular Pressure Assessment in Patients with Lysosomal Storage Diseases.
Wasielica-Poslednik J; Politino G; Schmidtmann I; Lorenz K; Bell K; Pfeiffer N; Pitz S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0168698. PubMed ID: 28081172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese.
Lam A; Chen D; Chiu R; Chui WS
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):909-14. PubMed ID: 17873777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparisons of the Tono-Pen® and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients in a Hospital Population in Southwest Nigeria.
Onochie C; Okoye O; Ogunro A; Aribaba T; Hassan K; Onakoya A
Med Princ Pract; 2016; 25(6):566-571. PubMed ID: 27504638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].
Hager A; Schroeder B; Sadeghi M; Grossherr M; Wiegand W
Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jun; 104(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 17587093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Comparation of the new rebound tonometer IOPen and the Goldmann tonometer, and their relationship to corneal properties.
Moreno-Montañés J; Gosende I; Caire J; García-Granero M
Eye (Lond); 2011 Jan; 25(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20885426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Corneal hysteresis and anterior segment optical coherence tomography anatomical parameters in primary angle closure suspects.
Hussnain SA; Kovacs KD; Warren JL; Teng CC
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 46(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 29251401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.
Wachtl J; Töteberg-Harms M; Frimmel S; Roos M; Kniestedt C
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 135(6):601-608. PubMed ID: 28494071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.
Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Shah S; Laiquzzaman M; Mantry S; Cunliffe I
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 18954311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.
Zimmermann M; Pitz S; Schmidtmann I; Pfeiffer N; Wasielica-Poslednik J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169438. PubMed ID: 28068365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
