These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23009294)
1. Malignancy rates of non-masslike enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging using American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors. Wilhelm A; McDonough MD; DePeri ER Breast J; 2012; 18(6):523-6. PubMed ID: 23009294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors. Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. Tozaki M; Igarashi T; Fukuda K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):313-21. PubMed ID: 16861532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound. Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Non-masslike enhancement on breast MRI: interpretation pearls]. Thomassin-Naggara I; Salem C; Darai E; Bazot M; Uzan S; Marsault C; Chopier J J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 90(3 Pt 1):269-75. PubMed ID: 19421111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non mass-like enhancement categories detected by breast MRI and histological findings. Ballesio L; Di Pastena F; Gigli S; D'ambrosio I; Aceti A; Pontico M; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM; Tardioli S Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 24706319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ductal pattern enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging of the breast due to ductal lavage. Ghanouni P; Kurian AW; Margolis D; Hartman AR; Mills MA; Plevritis SK; Ford JM; Daniel BL Breast J; 2007; 13(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17461903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Molleran V; Mahoney MC Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):171-85, vii. PubMed ID: 20494304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population? Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. Wang LC; DeMartini WB; Partridge SC; Peacock S; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):826-31. PubMed ID: 19696298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast imaging: is the sonographic descriptor of orientation valid for magnetic resonance imaging? Oliveira TM; Brasileiro Sant'Anna TK; Mauad FM; Elias J; Muglia VF J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22911937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathologic correlates of false positive breast magnetic resonance imaging findings: which lesions warrant biopsy? Langer SA; Horst KC; Ikeda DM; Daniel BL; Kong CS; Dirbas FM Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 16164938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-risk breast lesions at imaging-guided needle biopsy: usefulness of MRI for treatment decision. Londero V; Zuiani C; Linda A; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W240-50. PubMed ID: 22826427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. Uematsu T; Kasami M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1223-30. PubMed ID: 22528918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of dynamic phase subtraction (DPS) map in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Ogura A; Hayakawa K; Yoshida S; Maeda F; Saeki F; Syukutani A J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 22082548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings]. Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance. Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Handling a high relaxivity contrast material for dynamic breast MR imaging using higher thresholds for the initial enhancement. Carbonaro LA; Verardi N; Di Leo G; Sardanelli F Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 20065856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]