BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23009735)

  • 1. Sex estimation of infants between birth and one year through discriminant analysis of the humerus and femur.
    Stull KE; Godde K
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 23009735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New identification criteria for the Chilean population: Estimation of sex and stature.
    Ross AH; Manneschi MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jan; 204(1-3):206.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20728293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population.
    Alunni-Perret V; Staccini P; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 17624707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual dimorphism of the humerus in contemporary Cretans--a population-specific study and a review of the literature*.
    Kranioti EF; Michalodimitrakis M
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Sep; 54(5):996-1000. PubMed ID: 19627412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A geometric-morphometric study of the Cretan humerus for sex identification.
    Kranioti EF; Bastir M; Sánchez-Meseguer A; Rosas A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):111.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19446415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metric determination of sex from the humerus in a Guatemalan forensic sample.
    Ríos Frutos L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):153-7. PubMed ID: 15567620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual dimorphism of the arm bones in a modern greek population.
    Charisi D; Eliopoulos C; Vanna V; Koilias CG; Manolis SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 20840296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex determination of prehistoric central California skeletal remains using discriminant analysis of the femur and humerus.
    Dittrick J; Suchey JM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 May; 70(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 3089023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Getting Rid of Dichotomous Sex Estimations: Why Logistic Regression Should be Preferred Over Discriminant Function Analysis.
    Bartholdy BP; Sandoval E; Hoogland MLP; Schrader SA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1685-1691. PubMed ID: 32521059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex identification and software development using digital femoral head radiographs.
    Kranioti EF; Vorniotakis N; Galiatsou C; Işcan MY; Michalodimitrakis M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):113.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19443150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population.
    du Jardin P; Ponsaillé J; Alunni-Perret V; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):127.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19733989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of the accuracy of discriminant function equations for sex determination of the femur and tibia from a South African population.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):212.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21251773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
    DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forearm bones and sexual variation in Turkish population.
    Uzün I; Işcan MY; Celbiş O
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Dec; 32(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 21546820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of Purkait's triangle method on a skeletal population from southern Europe.
    Anastopoulou I; Eliopoulos C; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():203.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25459271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A metric method for sex determination using the proximal femur and fragmentary hipbone.
    Albanese J; Eklics G; Tuck A
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Nov; 53(6):1283-8. PubMed ID: 18717754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Humeral and femoral head diameters in recent white American skeletons.
    Milner GR; Boldsen JL
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22074229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of sexual dimorphism in the femur among North Indians.
    Srivastava R; Saini V; Rai RK; Pandey S; Tripathi SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 21854380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a contemporary Spanish population.
    García-Parra P; Pérez Fernández Á; Djorojevic M; Botella M; Alemán I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():313.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25102779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.