These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23010064)

  • 1. Does bimanual grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion provide evidence for a functional segregation of dorsal and ventral streams?
    Foster RM; Kleinholdermann U; Leifheit S; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3392-402. PubMed ID: 23010064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.
    Hanisch C; Konczak J; Dohle C
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 11315553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion.
    Króliczak G; Heard P; Goodale MA; Gregory RL
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16516866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1939-47. PubMed ID: 17240408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grasping behavior in schizophrenia suggests selective impairment in the dorsal visual pathway.
    King JP; Christensen BK; Westwood DA
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2008 Nov; 117(4):799-811. PubMed ID: 19025227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach.
    Cohen NR; Cross ES; Tunik E; Grafton ST; Culham JC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19168086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.
    Biegstraaten M; de Grave DD; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 17146650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ventral and dorsal stream interactions during the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion: evidence derived from fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.
    Plewan T; Weidner R; Eickhoff SB; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2015-29. PubMed ID: 22721374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Heath M; Rival C; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 15278330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grasping for parsimony: do some motor actions escape dorsal processing?
    Janczyk M; Franz VH; Kunde W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3405-15. PubMed ID: 20599441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.
    Kwok RM; Braddick OJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):932-40. PubMed ID: 12667529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Rival C; Olivier I; Ceyte H; Ferrel C
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 14513301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures.
    Heath M; Rival C; Neely K
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 16175361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.