45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23010610)
1. Quantification and normalization of x-ray mammograms.
Tromans CE; Cocker MR; Brady SM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6519-40. PubMed ID: 23010610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model of primary and scattered photon fluence for mammographic x-ray image quantification.
Tromans CE; Cocker MR; Brady SM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6541-70. PubMed ID: 23010667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity of photon-counting based K-edge imaging in X-ray computed tomography.
Roessl E; Brendel B; Engel KJ; Schlomka JP; Thran A; Proksa R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1678-90. PubMed ID: 21507770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital tomosynthesis aided by low-resolution exact computed tomography.
Zeng K; Yu H; Zhao S; Fajardo LL; Ruth C; Jing Z; Wang G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):976-83. PubMed ID: 18043366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Packard N; Boone JM; Al-Mayah A; Brock KK; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3027-44. PubMed ID: 20463377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of absorbed radiation dose in refraction-enhanced breast tomosynthesis by a Laue case analyser.
Sato H; Ando M; Shimao D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):231-3. PubMed ID: 21515613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compression paddle tilt correction in full-field digital mammograms.
Kallenberg MG; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):703-15. PubMed ID: 22241616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction.
Heine JJ; Cao K; Thomas JA
Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Nov; 9():73. PubMed ID: 21080916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. X-ray luminescence computed tomography via selective excitation: a feasibility study.
Pratx G; Carpenter CM; Sun C; Xing L
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1992-9. PubMed ID: 20615807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms.
Pawluczyk O; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 11339739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRT letter: Quantum noise removal and classification of breast mammogram images.
Naseem MT; Sulong GB; Jaffar MA
Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Dec; 75(12):1609-12. PubMed ID: 23034955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Least squares parameter estimation methods for material decomposition with energy discriminating detectors.
Le Huy Q; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):245-55. PubMed ID: 21361193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical challenges in generalizing calibration techniques for breast density measurements.
Fowler EEE; Smallwood AM; Khan NZ; Kilpatrick K; Sellers TA; Heine J
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):679-688. PubMed ID: 30525207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Computerized estimation of a percent glandular tissue composition in computed radiography mammography].
Tsujita N; Goto S; Azuma Y; Shiraishi J
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(12):1540-7. PubMed ID: 22186199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of compressed breast thickness during mammography.
Highnam RP; Brady JM; Shepstone BJ
Br J Radiol; 1998 Jun; 71(846):646-53. PubMed ID: 9849389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
