159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23011536)
1. Screening practices of Australian men and women categorized as "at or slightly above average risk" of colorectal cancer.
Ait Ouakrim D; Lockett T; Boussioutas A; Keogh L; Flander LB; Winship I; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA
Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1853-64. PubMed ID: 23011536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer.
Ait Ouakrim D; Boussioutas A; Lockett T; Winship I; Giles GG; Flander LB; Keogh L; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2012 Feb; 5(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 22030089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.
Dillon M; Flander L; Buchanan DD; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Winship IM; Boussioutas A; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D
PLoS Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):e1002630. PubMed ID: 30114221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.
Courtney RJ; Paul CL; Carey ML; Sanson-Fisher RW; Macrae FA; D'Este C; Hill D; Barker D; Simmons J
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():13. PubMed ID: 23305355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.
Courtney RJ; Paul CL; Sanson-Fisher RW; Macrae FA; Carey ML; Attia J; McEvoy M
BMC Public Health; 2013 Mar; 13():248. PubMed ID: 23514586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Australia: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.
He E; Lew JB; Egger S; Banks E; Ward RL; Beral V; Canfell K
Prev Med; 2018 Jan; 106():185-193. PubMed ID: 29109015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.
Todorov K; Wilson C; Sharplin G; Corsini N
Aust Health Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28248632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.
van der Vlugt M; Grobbee EJ; Bossuyt PMM; Bos A; Bongers E; Spijker W; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
Gastroenterology; 2017 Aug; 153(2):439-447.e2. PubMed ID: 28483499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Croatia (2007-2011).
Katičić M; Antoljak N; Kujundžić M; Stamenić V; Skoko Poljak D; Kramarić D; Stimac D; Strnad Pešikan M; Samija M; Ebling Z
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 18(32):4300-7. PubMed ID: 22969192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: a community-level perspective.
Courtney RJ; Paul CL; Sanson-Fisher RW; Macrae FA; Carey ML; Attia JR; McEvoy MA
Med J Aust; 2012 May; 196(8):516-20. PubMed ID: 22571309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lifestyle and occupational factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening among men and women in Australia.
Carey RN; El-Zaemey S
Prev Med; 2019 Sep; 126():105777. PubMed ID: 31319115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colon Cancer Screening - Is It Time Yet?
Bhurgri H; Samiullah S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Jun; 27(6):327-328. PubMed ID: 28689518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did and did not undergo screening: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.
Thompson J; Ng J; Armstrong B; Feletto E; Ha T
Cancer Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 72():101936. PubMed ID: 33839458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends and inequities in colorectal cancer screening participation in Ontario, Canada, 2005-2011.
Honein-AbouHaidar GN; Baxter NN; Moineddin R; Urbach DR; Rabeneck L; Bierman AS
Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 37(6):946-56. PubMed ID: 23702337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patterns of participation over four rounds of annual fecal immunochemical test-based screening for colorectal cancer: what predicts rescreening?
Osborne JM; Wilson C; Duncan A; Cole SR; Flight I; Turnbull D; Hughes DL; Young GP
BMC Public Health; 2017 Aug; 18(1):81. PubMed ID: 28764667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence, Clinico-demographic Profiles and Survival Rates of Colorectal Cancer in Northern Malaysia: Comparing Patients Above and Below 50 Years of Age.
Wan Ibrahim NR; Chan HK; Soelar SA; Azmi AN; Mohd Said R; Abu Hassan MR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Apr; 21(4):1057-1061. PubMed ID: 32334470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.
Sharma T
Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. To do or not to do - a survey study on factors associated with participating in the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer.
Nielsen JB; Berg-Beckhoff G; Leppin A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):43. PubMed ID: 33413310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptance on colorectal cancer screening upper age limit in South Korea.
Luu XQ; Lee K; Lee YY; Suh M; Kim Y; Choi KS
World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 26(27):3963-3974. PubMed ID: 32774070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
