326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23012463)
1. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques?
Hindman N; Ngo L; Genega EM; Melamed J; Wei J; Braza JM; Rofsky NM; Pedrosa I
Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):468-77. PubMed ID: 23012463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging.
Sasiwimonphan K; Takahashi N; Leibovich BC; Carter RE; Atwell TD; Kawashima A
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22344404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of T1-Weighted MRI to Detect Intratumoral Hemorrhage Within Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma as a Feature Differentiating From Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat.
Murray CA; Quon M; McInnes MD; van der Pol CB; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Sep; 207(3):585-91. PubMed ID: 27275530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from other neoplasms at double-echo chemical shift FLASH MR imaging.
Kim JK; Kim SH; Jang YJ; Ahn H; Kim CS; Park H; Lee JW; Kim S; Cho KS
Radiology; 2006 Apr; 239(1):174-80. PubMed ID: 16507752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive Value of Chemical-Shift MRI in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma.
Jhaveri KS; Elmi A; Hosseini-Nik H; Hedgire S; Evans A; Jewett M; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W79-86. PubMed ID: 26102422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 27824487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of T2-weighted MRI with and without fat suppression for differentiating renal angiomyolipomas without visible fat from other renal tumors.
Chung MS; Choi HJ; Kim MH; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 24660704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Non-contrast Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Jomoto W; Takaki H; Yamamoto S; Kanematsu A; Igeta M; Hirota S; Yamakado K
In Vivo; 2022; 36(6):2790-2799. PubMed ID: 36309367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unenhanced CT and MRI Parameters That Can Be Used to Reliably Predict Fat-Invisible Angiomyolipoma.
Jeong CJ; Park BK; Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26797361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Routinely performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate common subtypes of renal tumours.
Cornelis F; Tricaud E; Lasserre AS; Petitpierre F; Bernhard JC; Le Bras Y; Yacoub M; Bouzgarrou M; Ravaud A; Grenier N
Eur Radiol; 2014 May; 24(5):1068-80. PubMed ID: 24557052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of signal loss in in-phase gradient-echo images for differentiation between small renal cell carcinoma and lipid-poor angiomyolipomas.
Lima FVA; Elias J; Chahud F; Reis RB; Muglia VF
Br J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 93(1108):20190975. PubMed ID: 31971819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI evaluation of small (<4cm) solid renal masses: multivariate modeling improves diagnostic accuracy for angiomyolipoma without visible fat compared to univariate analysis.
Schieda N; Dilauro M; Moosavi B; Hodgdon T; Cron GO; McInnes MD; Flood TA
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2242-51. PubMed ID: 26486936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-echo gradient chemical shift MR imaging fails to differentiate minimal fat renal angiomyolipomas from other homogeneous solid renal tumors.
Ferré R; Cornelis F; Verkarre V; Eiss D; Correas JM; Grenier N; Hélénon O
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):360-365. PubMed ID: 25547327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Circularity Index on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Helps Distinguish Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analyses of Histologically Proven 257 Small Renal Tumors Less Than 4 cm.
Kang HS; Park JJ
Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 33660463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exophytic renal masses: angular interface with renal parenchyma for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions at MR imaging.
Verma SK; Mitchell DG; Yang R; Roth CG; O'Kane P; Verma M; Parker L
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 20160001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of T2-weighted MR imaging in differentiating low-fat renal angiomyolipomas from other renal tumors.
Choi HJ; Kim JK; Ahn H; Kim CS; Kim MH; Cho KS
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 21498374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes--correlation with pathologic findings.
Sun MR; Ngo L; Genega EM; Atkins MB; Finn ME; Rofsky NM; Pedrosa I
Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):793-802. PubMed ID: 19244046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]