These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2301297)
1. Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions through the use of the Bionator appliance. Report of two cases. Rutter RR; Witt E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 2301297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of the bionator appliance in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion in the late mixed dentition. Tsamtsouris A; Vedrenne D J Pedod; 1983; 8(1):78-104. PubMed ID: 6584584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1. Bolmgren GA; Moshiri F Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 3461735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The Bimzat skeletal activator in the treatment of Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions in the mixed dentition]. Genone B Dent Cadmos; 1985 Dec; 53(20):17-25, 29-32, 35-9 passim. PubMed ID: 3869560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. Part 3. Functional appliance therapy. Rock WP Br Dent J; 1990 Mar; 168(6):253-6. PubMed ID: 2322491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Intensive treatment in severe distal bite using the headgear-Herbst appliance in mixed dentition]. Wieslander L Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1984 Nov; 94(11):1189-206. PubMed ID: 6595787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The cervical headgear action in the mixed dentition on maxilla, mandible and teeth in class II, division 1, malocclusions--a cephalometric study (author's transl)]. Henriques JF; Martins DR; Pinzan A Ortodontia; 1979; 12(2):76-86. PubMed ID: 397458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. Wieslander L; Lagerström L Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 283692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Correction of Class II, division 1, malocclusion with the use of an activator appliance: a case report. Kocadereli I Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 7991770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A cephalometric comparison of orthopedic (Activator) headgear and orthodontic (Edgewise) treatments in Class II, 1 malocclusions]. Altuğ Z Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1988 May; 15(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3271149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Treatment of a basal and dental Class II malocclusion in mixed dentition, with functional appliances and extraoral traction]. Viora E; Mossino ML; Ramirez Velarde JC; Guglielmino D Minerva Ortognatod; 1989; 7(3-4):117-32. PubMed ID: 2640572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances. Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical application of the Fränkel appliance. Case reports. Owen AH Angle Orthod; 1983 Jan; 53(1):29-88. PubMed ID: 6573864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator]. Demirović D; Filipović M Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Case report. John Lickteig. Skeletal Class II Division 1. Witzig JW Funct Orthod; 1985; 2(5):12-5. PubMed ID: 3865870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance]. Schiavoni R Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Case report of Fränkel appliance therapy type II and type IV during growth]. Morita S; Tokuda N; Kohmura T; Takato M; Hara S; Fukamachi H; Hanada K Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Jun; 45(2):311-25. PubMed ID: 3462278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal Class II treatment with the Chateau appliance. Craig WH; Petit HP; Chateau M J Pedod; 1987; 11(2):120-38. PubMed ID: 3546662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The monoblock: a stage in the therapy of cl. II]. Flageul F; Fontenelle A; Lautrou A Orthod Fr; 1984; 55(2):523-5. PubMed ID: 6599563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]